On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, at 06:17, Dave Cridland wrote:
> All that said it was fashionable a few years back to treat the RFC 2119
> keywords as case-insensitive; I personally think this caused much more
> trouble than it could possibly have solved.
FWIW, this isn't entirely hypothetical. I can't
On Sat, 13 Oct 2018, 19:10 Tedd Sterr, wrote:
> > *2) PR #706 - Update BCP 14 language to comply with RFC 8174* -
> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/706
>
> I have to wonder whether "an implementation must" could mean anything
> different from "an implementation MUST" -- how else could it be
>