On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, at 06:17, Dave Cridland wrote: > All that said it was fashionable a few years back to treat the RFC 2119 > keywords as case-insensitive; I personally think this caused much more > trouble than it could possibly have solved.
FWIW, this isn't entirely hypothetical. I can't remember what the situation was, but I made this PR because I was discussing a requirement with someone and they were using an RFC 2119 interpretation where it wasn't required, or were confused about how to use them in their protoxep, etc. If the person I was talking too remembers who they are or what the situation was, it may be helpful for you to mention it here :) —Sam _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
