Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-17 Thread Sam Whited
Since this was brought up twice I wanted to respond to it: This XEP is not Markdown and its syntax is not compatible with Markdown. I have never seen an implementation that used a Markdown library, and if they did it would not be compatible so I don't see this as an issue or a likely problem

Re: [Standards] XEP-0424: Service discovery on the server side

2020-05-17 Thread JC Brand
Hi Pawel, sorry for taking so long to respond, this email didn't come up on my radar. On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:48:52PM +0200, Pawel Chrzaszcz wrote: 8-< >According to the XEP: "If a client or service implements message >retraction, it MUST specify the

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-17 Thread Jonas Schäfer
On Diestag, 12. Mai 2020 21:35:42 CEST Jonas Schäfer wrote: > Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send > your feedback to the standards@xmpp.org discussion list: > > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol > stack or to clarify an existing

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-17 Thread Maxime Buquet
On 2020/05/12, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send > your feedback to the standards@xmpp.org discussion list: > > 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol > stack or to clarify an existing protocol? No. > 2. Does