Re: [Standards] Council Minutes 2020-05-13

On Thu May 14, 2020 at 8:56 PM CEST, Tedd Sterr wrote: > 4) PR #943 - XEP-0068: Clarify FORM_TYPE field type on 'submit' type > forms = > - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/943 > Jonas notes this is re-do of PR #913 after it was vetoed by Dave [1]. > Jonas suggests the following addition - '=85as t

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Channel Binding Pseudomechanisms

Am So., 10. Mai 2020 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Florian Schmaus : > > > > EXTERNAL > SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS > PLAIN > > > > > > > > would be sufficient for the client to now what do to. Even if > 'tls-exporter' is SCRAM specific, because its specification then surel

Re: [Standards] Council Minutes 2020-05-06

Am Di., 12. Mai 2020 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Tedd Sterr : > > https://logs.xmpp.org/council/2020-05-06?p=h#2020-05-06-203d250e68ba702f > > 1) Roll Call > Present: Jonas, Zash, Daniel, Georg > Apologies: Dave > > 2) Agenda Bashing > Nothing to add/modify. > > 3) Editor's Update > * Expired calls: > -

Re: [Standards] Council Minutes 2020-05-13

> 4) PR #943 - XEP-0068: Clarify FORM_TYPE field type on 'submit' type forms - > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/943 > Jonas notes this is re-do of PR #913 after it was vetoed by Dave [1]. > Jonas suggests the following addition - '…as the FORM_TYPE field with the > special meaning defined herei

[Standards] XMPP Council Agenda 2020-05-20

Hi everyone, The next XMPP Council Meeting will take place on 2020-05-20 at 15:00Z in xmpp:coun...@muc.xmpp.org?join. Everyone is welcome to join and add to the discussions. This agenda is composed from: - Editor notifications to standards@ - xsf/xeps GitHub PRs marked as Needs Council - Sugge

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Channel Binding Pseudomechanisms

On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 14:43, Sam Whited wrote: > > I'd be fine with putting channel bindings alongside mechanisms, just > > not pretending they are mechanisms. > > I still don't see why it bothers anyone. We already do this with "- > PLUS", so what is wrong with adding another suffix? So far it'

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

Hello! 12.05.2020, 22:36, "Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor)" :This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments onXEP-0393.Title: Message StylingAbstract:This specification defines a formatted text syntax for use in instantmessages with simple text styling.URL: https://xmpp

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Channel Binding Pseudomechanisms

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 18:39, Sam Whited wrote: > No one has indicated why they think this is a bad thing yet. They are not mechanisms, but pretend to be, thus breaking the semantics of what that element is intended to contain. > It seems > fine to me. As I said, these mechanisms aren't full