Hello,
Thank you Jonas and sorry for being late.
I have carefully read the feedback and sent a PR
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/1121 . I noted 3 suggestions which didn't have
any objection.
Add XEP-0455: Service Outage Status to Future Development - done
Too many "core" - I took a
On 29 Sep 2021, at 17:32, Georg Lukas wrote:
>
> Sorry this is so late, and thanks to Sonny for taking up the hard task
> of fighting this through the Council.
>
> * Jonas Schäfer [2021-09-07 16:04]:
>> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
>> XEP-0459 [...] XMPP
* Georg Lukas [2021-09-29 18:32]:
1. As part of the work on XEP-0313, two XEPs got split out:
- XEP-0441: Message Archive Management Preferences
- XEP-0442: Pubsub Message Archive Management
I think that at least XEP-0441 belongs into Advanced IM to keep the
same functionality as before.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:33 PM Georg Lukas wrote:
> 1. As part of the work on XEP-0313, two XEPs got split out:
>
> - XEP-0441: Message Archive Management Preferences
> - XEP-0442: Pubsub Message Archive Management
>
> I think that at least XEP-0441 belongs into Advanced IM to keep the
> same
Sorry this is so late, and thanks to Sonny for taking up the hard task
of fighting this through the Council.
* Jonas Schäfer [2021-09-07 16:04]:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0459 [...] XMPP Compliance Suites 2022
1. As part of the work on XEP-0313, two
On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 11:04, Kim Alvefur wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:37:37AM +0100, Dave Cridland wrote:
> >On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 16:46, Matthew Wild wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 15:24, Tedd Sterr
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 4. The original version (XEP-0242/0243) had two simple
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 10:37:37AM +0100, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 16:46, Matthew Wild wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 15:24, Tedd Sterr wrote:
4. The original version (XEP-0242/0243) had two simple categories, Core
and Advanced, and that was all; later versions just
On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 16:46, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 15:24, Tedd Sterr wrote:
>
>> 4. The original version (XEP-0242/0243) had two simple categories, Core
>> and Advanced, and that was all; later versions just continued with that.
>> The IM Suite, especially, is becoming
On Tue, 21 Sept 2021 at 15:24, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> 4. The original version (XEP-0242/0243) had two simple categories, Core
> and Advanced, and that was all; later versions just continued with that.
> The IM Suite, especially, is becoming quite top-heavy, so adding a middle
> level would be good
Sorry this is last minute, but here are some thoughts:
1. The Last Call questions aren't really appropriate because
usual-argument-about-compliance-suites-not-really-belonging-in-standards-track.
2. I know the idea is to get it out of the way before change of Council, but it
still feels too
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
XEP-0459.
Title: XMPP Compliance Suites 2022
Abstract:
This document defines XMPP application categories for different use
cases (Core, Web, IM, and Mobile), and specifies the required XEPs
that client and server software needs to
11 matches
Mail list logo
