I would like us to Get This Right, though. People have been mumbling about
replacing MUC for years, and I’ve always been resistant;
the discussions at the summit this year persuaded me that we finally have
requirements that MUC1 can’t easily meet, but I really do
not want us to do MUC2
On 26 Jun 2015 07:24, Steve Kille steve.ki...@isode.com wrote:
I would like us to Get This Right, though. People have been mumbling
about replacing MUC for years, and I’ve always been resistant;
the discussions at the summit this year persuaded me that we finally
have requirements that MUC1
On 25 Jun 2015, at 11:11, Daniel Gultsch dan...@gultsch.de wrote:
As I understand this MUC2 should not rely replace the current MUC but provide
an alternative.
Not really, the aim is to fix the issues MUC has, and produce something better
that can be used in its place in the future.
Someone
Hi,
2015-06-25 10:27 GMT+02:00 Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon. We’ve
pretty much killed off fully anonymous rooms in MUC1.
Can people share their thoughts on usecases for semi-anon, please? It’s
not entirely clear to me
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
Can people share their thoughts on usecases for semi-anon, please? It’s not
entirely clear to me what these are (users who want anonymity seem to already
be using throw-away JIDs to achieve that, instead of relying on
On 25 jun. 2015, at 10:27, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon. We’ve
pretty much killed off fully anonymous rooms in MUC1.
Can people share their thoughts on usecases for semi-anon, please? It’s not
entirely
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2015, at 15:28, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Semi-anonymous rooms are like IRC channels. Draw your own conclusions for
whether that's good or bad.
I don’t think that’s true, is it? Having
On 25.06.2015 17:09, Thijs Alkemade wrote:
On 25 jun. 2015, at 10:27, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon. We’ve
pretty much killed off fully anonymous rooms in MUC1.
Can people share their thoughts on usecases for
On 25 Jun 2015, at 15:28, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
On 6/25/15 2:27 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon.
s/had/has/
I think ‘had’ was right. Anonymous rooms were removed in 0.6 by a certain “PSA”
:)
Now it has
On 25 Jun 2015, at 15:48, Sam Whited s...@samwhited.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2015, at 15:28, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
Semi-anonymous rooms are like IRC channels. Draw your own conclusions for
On 25 June 2015 at 15:28, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net wrote:
On 6/25/15 2:27 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon.
s/had/has/
We’ve pretty much killed off fully anonymous rooms in MUC1.
I think those were never
On 6/25/15 8:39 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On 25 Jun 2015, at 15:28, Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net
wrote:
On 6/25/15 2:27 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had
Anon/semianon/nonanon.
s/had/has/
I think ‘had’ was right. Anonymous rooms were removed in
On 25 Jun 2015, at 16:59, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
Removing a widely deployed feature doesn't strike me as a viable option.
Well, if we s/widely deployed/widely required/ then I agree. But not baking
something into the MUC2 core doesn’t necessarily mean removing the feature. If
On 25 Jun 2015 18:05, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2015, at 16:59, Dave Cridland d...@cridland.net wrote:
Removing a widely deployed feature doesn't strike me as a viable option.
Well, if we s/widely deployed/widely required/ then I agree. But not
baking something into
On 25 June 2015 at 09:27, Kevin Smith kevin.sm...@isode.com wrote:
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon. We’ve
pretty much killed off fully anonymous rooms in MUC1.
Can people share their thoughts on usecases for semi-anon, please? It’s
not entirely clear to me
Thinking a bit about the MUC2 stuff. MUC1 had Anon/semianon/nonanon. We’ve
pretty much killed off fully anonymous rooms in MUC1.
Can people share their thoughts on usecases for semi-anon, please? It’s not
entirely clear to me what these are (users who want anonymity seem to already
be using
16 matches
Mail list logo
