subject:"\[Standards\] New Format for MIX proxy JID"

Re: [Standards] New Format for MIX proxy JID

2017-03-16 Thread Dave Cridland

Looks reasonable to me. I'd appreciate a namespace bump. On 16 March 2017 at 11:03, Steve Kille wrote: > > Georg has suggested a new order for proxy JID. I've discussed with Kevin > Smith and we think the rationale for change of order makes sense. > > The original

[Standards] New Format for MIX proxy JID

2017-03-16 Thread Steve Kille

Georg has suggested a new order for proxy JID. I've discussed with Kevin Smith and we think the rationale for change of order makes sense. The original rationale for this syntax as to align to "plus addressing" used with email address. If we are going to change the order a new separator seems