Re: [Standards] Presence Handling

fic (n*n) > * It does not give a framework to solve channel presence distribution for JID > Hidden > > Steve > > FROM: Manuel Rubio <man...@altenwald.com> > SENT: 25 May 2018 00:08 > TO: XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org> > CC: Steve Kille <steve.ki...@i

Re: [Standards] Presence Handling

man...@altenwald.com> Sent: 25 May 2018 00:08 To: XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org> Cc: Steve Kille <steve.ki...@isode.com> Subject: Re: [Standards] Presence Handling Hi, I think presence isn't important to have the real JID. If you know the real JID for a participant you can subscri

Re: [Standards] Presence Handling

Hi, I think presence isn't important to have the real JID. If you know the real JID for a participant you can subscribe to its real JID to receive the presence directly from the user instead of both MIX and User. The point is the tag "" inside of the message. The way to add or use real JIDs

Re: [Standards] Presence Handling

Dave, That would also be problematic, since entities would then need to process presence rather differently, even more so than they do for MUC now. I was thinking simply: [Steve Kille] So what value is the proxy JID giving, given that the data

Re: [Standards] Presence Handling

Dave, From: Standards <standards-boun...@xmpp.org> On Behalf Of Dave Cridland Sent: 24 May 2018 16:29 To: XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org> Subject: Re: [Standards] Presence Handling I think that would be awful. If you want additional data to go along with the pr

Re: [Standards] Presence Handling

On 24 May 2018 at 16:25, Steve Kille wrote: > Manuel, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Manuel Rubio > > Sent: 24 May 2018 15:21 > > To: XMPP Standards > > Cc: Steve Kille > > Subject: Re:

[Standards] Presence Handling

Manuel, > -Original Message- > From: Manuel Rubio > Sent: 24 May 2018 15:21 > To: XMPP Standards > Cc: Steve Kille > Subject: Re: [Standards] MIX and ProxyJIDs > > Hi Steve, > > actually I never say anything about