Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Annual review (In-Band Real Time Text)

> On 29 Sep 2015, at 21:44, Mark Rejhon wrote: > > Re: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html > > Infopage: http://www.realjabber.org > > I am doing an annual review of XEP-0301 adoption

Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Annual review (In-Band Real Time Text)

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > If we fix the schema, would this force namespace to increment: > i.e. urn:xmpp:rtt:1 instead of urn:xmpp:rtt:0 > > My commentary: All developers have complied with the assumed latter schema, > since it was obvious from the

[Standards] XEP-0301 Annual review (In-Band Real Time Text)

Re: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0301.html Infopage: http://www.realjabber.org I am doing an annual review of XEP-0301 adoption status. Last year, no change was deemed necessary. However, one developer submitted an errata, which I am now confirming with XSF. New implementations: -

Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Annual review (In-Band Real Time Text)

On 29.09.2015 22:44, Mark Rejhon wrote: > There is this pending cosmetic errata, that we wish to confirm with > XSF members: > > Christian Schudt (of Babbler) says of XEP-0301: > >>2. The XML Schema might be wrong, but I am not sure. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I