> 1½) Isn't it Nice when Tedd Sterr does the minutes?
https://gfycat.com/SpottedRecklessIndusriverdolphin
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
> I don't want to put words in anybody's mouth, but to me it looks like
> Kev said it would be better to bump this than to have a second
> specification, not that changing this spec needs a bump.
"That was my original expectation too, but Kev suggested the bump would be
preferable. [...to a
On 13 June 2018 at 21:59, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-06-13/#15:03:33
>
> Dave apologises for not preparing an agenda; apparently, having a day job
> is distracting.
>
> *1) Roll Call*
> Present: Kev, Daniel, Sam, Dave
> Away on a top-secret mission: Georg
>
*1½) Isn't
> This wouldn’t be an issue if clients use sufficiently unique IDs.
I'm not sure that magically fixes the issue.
New RMC clients can and should use unique IDs - and we can mandate that - but
the issue here is with older LMC non-RMC-aware clients.So, if those clients
expect LMC to only ever be
http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-06-13/#15:03:33
Dave apologises for not preparing an agenda; apparently, having a day job is
distracting.
1) Roll Call
Present: Kev, Daniel, Sam, Dave
Away on a top-secret mission: Georg
2) Agenda Bash
Dave is unaware of anything that needs a vote, and asks
First of all, thanks to Georg for making Sam clarify his position, which I
misread similarly. Thanks to Sam for clarifying, this makes *much* more sense
now. I think you two rehashes the key parts. I’d like to chime in as a
developer who recently implemented support for the MUC voice request
