On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 20:38, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> +1. Example 6 looks like a copy-paste error. Who wrote these specs?!?
>
>
Thankfully, for years we either couldn't, or at least normally didn't,
commit directly to the XEP repository ourselves, and left it to the Editor
to actually commit
On 5/7/21 7:33 AM, Edwin Mons wrote:
> On 07/05/2021 14:33, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> On 7 May 2021, at 13:30, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:10, Edwin Mons wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at XEP-0198, and noticed something odd in Example 6.
Shouldn't that have
On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 14:34, Edwin Mons wrote:
> On 07/05/2021 14:33, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > The text in question mentions wanting the connection terminated, which
> suggests stream error is right (which also seems logically sound to me).
> >
> > "If a server receives a second element it SHOULD
On 07/05/2021 14:33, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 7 May 2021, at 13:30, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:10, Edwin Mons wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I was looking at XEP-0198, and noticed something odd in Example 6.
>>> Shouldn't that have been a stream error instead, as the text above
On 7 May 2021, at 13:30, Matthew Wild wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:10, Edwin Mons wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was looking at XEP-0198, and noticed something odd in Example 6.
>> Shouldn't that have been a stream error instead, as the text above
>> states? If so, will send out a PR.
>
On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 12:10, Edwin Mons wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at XEP-0198, and noticed something odd in Example 6.
> Shouldn't that have been a stream error instead, as the text above
> states? If so, will send out a PR.
Which is correct? The text or the example? While I was
Hi all,
I was looking at XEP-0198, and noticed something odd in Example 6.
Shouldn't that have been a stream error instead, as the text above
states? If so, will send out a PR.
Edwin
___
Standards mailing list
Info:
