Re: [Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-10-22

2019-12-10 Thread Kim Alvefur
On Tue Dec 10, 2019 at 12:05 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:26, Kim Alvefur wrote: > > Does this wording look sane? > > > > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/848/commits/21128e508c76bfe5e0f50b490d9f4849472a2955 > > > It does to me, at first glance. It’s not immediately clear what

Re: [Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-10-22

2019-12-10 Thread Kevin Smith
On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:26, Kim Alvefur wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:52:35PM +, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 23 Oct 2019, at 15:25, Tedd Sterr wrote: >>> Advance to Draft: XEP-0292 (vCard4 Over XMPP) - >>> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0292.html >>> Dave: [pending] >>> Georg:

[Standards] Council Minutes 2019-12-04

2019-12-10 Thread Tedd Sterr
http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2019-12-04?p=h#2019-12-04-c6829034506b62e1 Jonas is sick and would prefer someone else chairs - Dave, glad to be free of chairing, volunteers. 1) Roll Call Present: Jonas, Zash, Dave, Daniel Apologies: Georg 2) Agenda Bashing Dave has no idea of what's going on and

Re: [Standards] Council Minutes 2019-12-04

2019-12-10 Thread Evgeny
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:52 AM, Tedd Sterr wrote: Dave notes this is unchanged since being rejected by the previous Council, and wants to avoid setting a precedent where an XEP is re-submitted unchanged until one Council eventually accepts it. Just my few cents: I'm with Dave here. If it

[Standards] XMPP Council Agenda for 2019-12-11

2019-12-10 Thread Jonas Schäfer
Hi everyone, The next XMPP Council Meeting will take place on 2019-12-11 at 16:00Z in xmpp:coun...@muc.xmpp.org?join. Everyone is welcome to join and give comments. This agenda is composed from: - xsf/xeps GitHub PRs marked as Needs Council - Suggestions directly sent to me (see below) Agenda

Re: [Standards] Resurrecting Reactions

2019-12-10 Thread Andrew Nenakhov
Our stance on reactions, in a collection of theses: - the most practical way to address reactions is something we refer to as 'fastening'. - fastening also looks like the best way to attach error messages to stanzas - fastening is also a possible way to do working message threads, slack-style

Re: [Standards] Resurrecting Reactions

2019-12-10 Thread Jonas Schäfer
(Okay, this is the second email in 48h I write with a table of contents. Should I worry?) Table of Contents: 1. General Stance on the Issue 2. Diagnosis on the current state of the XMPP Community 3. Diagnosis and Rationale for Reactions at the moment 4. How to move forward TL;DR: +0 on

Re: [Standards] Resurrecting Reactions

2019-12-10 Thread Kevin Smith
On 10 Dec 2019, at 18:12, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > I think > Kevin and the Reactions authors should have a direct discussion about > Fastening to move forward. It is my intention to find the Fastening feedback I missed and reply to the various threads over the next couple of days (including

Re: [Standards] Resurrecting Reactions

2019-12-10 Thread Jonas Schäfer
On Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2019 19:16:32 CET Kevin Smith wrote: > On 10 Dec 2019, at 18:12, Jonas Schäfer wrote: > > I think > > > > Kevin and the Reactions authors should have a direct discussion about > > Fastening to move forward. > > It is my intention to find the Fastening feedback I