Re: [Standards] Clarification for XEP-0054: private fields

2019-09-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/19/19 1:01 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > I am looking for a clarification on XEP-0054. The history description > for the XEP mentions that it essentially encapsulates > draft-dawson-vcard-xml-dtd-01 over XMPP, with changes to using > xuppercase for elements and adding JABBERID and > DESC. 

Re: [Standards] Clarification for XEP-0054: private fields

2019-09-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 9/19/19 1:24 AM, Matthew Wild wrote: > Prosody also historically preserved everything (it basically treated > the vcard as an XML blob). However now we have moved to vcard4, our > compatibility code can obviously only convert fields it knows and > understands - therefore any custom fields

Re: [Standards] Clarification for XEP-0054: private fields

2019-09-19 Thread Matthew Wild
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 08:10, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > My question is: are implementation of XEP-0054 supposed to a) strictly use > the DTD from XEP-0054, and thus required throw away any extra elements not > mentioned there, b) support private fields since they are mentioned in >

[Standards] Clarification for XEP-0054: private fields

2019-09-19 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Hi everyone, I am looking for a clarification on XEP-0054. The history description for the XEP mentions that it essentially encapsulates draft-dawson-vcard-xml-dtd-01 over XMPP, with changes to using xuppercase for elements and adding JABBERID and DESC. draft-dawson-vcard-xml-dtd-01 also