On 13 Jan 2017, at 12:22, Michal Piotrowski
wrote:
> I'm really interested in seeing the changes in bind2. Even if they are just
> notes.
And they’re out :)
/K
>
>
> Best regards
> Michal Piotrowski
> michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com
>
> On 13 January 2017 at 12:24, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 13.01.2017 10:27, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:09, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> >>
> >> Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:56:43 +
> >> Kevin Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’m obviously just about the last person to say we shouldn’t be
> >>> trying to modernise XMPP, given mix, bind2, etc., but this just
> >>> doesn’t seem like an area worth much effort as things stand.
> >>
> >> What is bind2?
> >
> > It’s something I’ve got (loosely) specced up to deal with the issues around
> > client history/unread/multiclient synchronisation by enhancing the initial
> > resource bind stanza.
>
> Great! I know that many people, including me, are looking forward to
> something like that (provided what you did is what I've in mind).
>
> Any reason that prevents you from making your work you have so far right
> now?
>
> Also, Is there any reason not to switch the bind step from stanzas to
> nonzas while we make changes to it?
>
> - Florian
>
>
>
> ___
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
> ___
>
>
> ___
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
> ___
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
___
