I'm really interested in seeing the changes in bind2. Even if they are just notes.
Best regards Michal Piotrowski michal.piotrow...@erlang-solutions.com On 13 January 2017 at 12:24, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote: > On 13.01.2017 10:27, Kevin Smith wrote: > > On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:09, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramt...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:56:43 +0000 > >> Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I’m obviously just about the last person to say we shouldn’t be > >>> trying to modernise XMPP, given mix, bind2, etc., but this just > >>> doesn’t seem like an area worth much effort as things stand. > >> > >> What is bind2? > > > > It’s something I’ve got (loosely) specced up to deal with the issues > around client history/unread/multiclient synchronisation by enhancing the > initial resource bind stanza. > > Great! I know that many people, including me, are looking forward to > something like that (provided what you did is what I've in mind). > > Any reason that prevents you from making your work you have so far right > now? > > Also, Is there any reason not to switch the bind step from stanzas to > nonzas while we make changes to it? > > - Florian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ > >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
