I'm really interested in seeing the changes in bind2. Even if they are just
On 13 January 2017 at 12:24, Florian Schmaus <f...@geekplace.eu> wrote:
> On 13.01.2017 10:27, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > On 11 Jan 2017, at 20:09, Evgeny Khramtsov <xramt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:56:43 +0000
> >> Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@isode.com> wrote:
> >>> I’m obviously just about the last person to say we shouldn’t be
> >>> trying to modernise XMPP, given mix, bind2, etc., but this just
> >>> doesn’t seem like an area worth much effort as things stand.
> >> What is bind2?
> > It’s something I’ve got (loosely) specced up to deal with the issues
> around client history/unread/multiclient synchronisation by enhancing the
> initial resource bind stanza.
> Great! I know that many people, including me, are looking forward to
> something like that (provided what you did is what I've in mind).
> Any reason that prevents you from making your work you have so far right
> Also, Is there any reason not to switch the bind step from stanzas to
> nonzas while we make changes to it?
> - Florian
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
Standards mailing list