Andrew Black wrote:
Greetings all.
On Friday, Martin performed a fairly major merge from trunk to
branches/4.2.0. The current results of this merge from nightly testing
can be found at http://people.apache.org/~ablack/4.2.0-rc5 . A handful
Just a correction for those who haven't been able to
Travis Vitek wrote:
> Andrew Black wrote:
[snip]
>> SVN trunk at r580086 should be identical to branches/4.2.0 at r580483,
>> assuming the merge ran correctly.
>>
>
> I don't know if that is a safe assumption or not. I believe that 4.2.1
> changes are happening on trunk but aren't being merged out
Andrew Black wrote:
>
>The question I have is whether it makes sense to tag branches/4.2.0 as
>of r580483 (Martin's integration) as tags/4.2.0-rc-5, or whether it
>makes more sense to include the changes which were merged today as part
>of the 4.2.0-rc-5 tag. I would argue for the former, in pa
Greetings all.
On Friday, Martin performed a fairly major merge from trunk to
branches/4.2.0. The current results of this merge from nightly testing
can be found at http://people.apache.org/~ablack/4.2.0-rc5 . A handful
of the platforms in the list (hpux-11.23-ia64, hpux-11.31-pa,
irix-6.5-mips,
