Hi all!
I assume you're not in C/C++ ? There you could get the times you want
with the GetProcessTimes() API. I don't think that theres a ready to use
programm like /bin/time for this, but it should't be too hard to write
something like this.
Cheers, Markus
Martin Sebor mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duft Markus wrote:
Hi all!
I assume you're not in C/C++ ?
That's right. I think the Windows scripts are written in some
Microsoft flavor of JavaScript or some such scripting language.
There you could get the times you want
with the GetProcessTimes() API. I don't think that theres a ready to
Martin Sebor wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
It seems that the problem is that the Cygwin environment defines part of
the
C++ runtime library in the C library.
It does? I don't see any such symbols in the localedef.imports file
attached to STDCXX-507 (although there are a lot symbols
Martin Sebor wrote:
STDCXX-546 suggests we create a separate mailing list to reflect Jira
traffic to so as to relieve stdcxx-dev from all the traffic. Since we
have just asked INFRA to move our mailing lists from the Incubator to
TLP (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1422) this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550136
]
Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-664:
-
The issue is that somehow the classic locale on AIX actually seems to
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:30 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PING] Re: library and build sizes on Windows
I've been doing some work on the test result scripts over the
weekend and
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:53 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: mailing list for Jira issues?
How does everyone feel about it?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-546
I
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:25 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-507 (or using
__declspec(dllexport/dllimport on gcc/cygwin in shared builds)
It seems that the problem is that
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
I have no objections. Either way, I need to look at both sets
of messages regardless of where they come from. So, for me,
moving the Jira messages to a new -issues list doesn't have
any significant impact.
I guess it might be useful for
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:56 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-507 (or using
__declspec(dllexport/dllimport on gcc/cygwin in shared builds)
Farid
Travis Vitek wrote:
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
I have no objections. Either way, I need to look at both sets
of messages regardless of where they come from. So, for me,
moving the Jira messages to a new -issues list doesn't have
any significant impact.
I guess it might
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 7:25 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-507 (or using
__declspec(dllexport/dllimport on gcc/cygwin in shared builds)
It seems that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550194
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-507:
-
The the thread below for a discussion of this issue:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:56 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] STDCXX-507 (or using
__declspec(dllexport/dllimport on gcc/cygwin in shared
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:30 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PING] Re: library and build sizes on Windows
I've been doing some work on the test result scripts over the
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
[snip]
But batman script also should to be updated to print the timestamp
of the build at the beginning (### date:); the duration of the
solution generating step (### real time (builddir):) after execution
of the configure.bat and total time at the
Andrew Black wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
[snip]
But batman script also should to be updated to print the timestamp
of the build at the beginning (### date:); the duration of the
solution generating step (### real time (builddir):) after execution
of the configure.bat and
Martin Sebor wrote:
Andrew Black wrote:
[snip]
The Batman script is build_stdcxx.bat, located along side the unix
build_stdcxx script. This script is batch file, which calls into
parse_runlog.wsf script for the purpose of processing the result log for
batman.
I suspect we're not going to
Andrew Black wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Andrew Black wrote:
[snip]
The Batman script is build_stdcxx.bat, located along side the unix
build_stdcxx script. This script is batch file, which calls into
parse_runlog.wsf script for the purpose of processing the result log for
batman.
I suspect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550251
]
Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-605:
-
1. Yes, all of this is because of the compiler bug. As it turns out, a
20 matches
Mail list logo
