On 03/24/2015 01:49 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:50:39AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 05:06:32PM +, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> [...]
>>> commit 8497b6222ed8ef606996d0ceb2bae260d82f95e2
>>> Author: Denys Vlasenko
>>> Date: Sat Mar 21 17:51:
On 03/24/2015 01:49 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:50:39AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 05:06:32PM +, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> [...]
>>> commit 8497b6222ed8ef606996d0ceb2bae260d82f95e2
>>> Author: Denys Vlasenko
>>> Date: Sat Mar 21 17:51:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:22:43PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 01:49 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:50:39AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 05:06:32PM +, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> commit 8497b6222ed8ef606996d0ce
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:37:51PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> I think entire personality 1 for SPARC is dead (doesn't work
> for many years) - all solaris_FOO()'s are printargs,
> except for lonely solaris_open().
Feel free to drop it.
--
ldv
pgppjzwIfHHAz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:10:34AM +0530, Prateek Gupta wrote:
> So, is the idea to remove all these code redundancies and provide a
> structured way to support multiarchitecture in a new way or to extend the
> current implementation?
>
> Regards,
> Prateek
Do you really think I'd propose extendi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:30:39PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Any ideas why on ALPHA and MIPS scno == 516, and on S390/S390X
> scno == -516 instead of 0 when attaching to a sleeping process?
I think I can answer this myself:
because these architectures (also m68k and or1k) use the same regist
