On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:22:43PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 03/24/2015 01:49 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:50:39AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 05:06:32PM +0000, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> commit 8497b6222ed8ef606996d0ceb2bae260d82f95e2
> >>> Author: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
> >>> Date:   Sat Mar 21 17:51:52 2015 +0100
> >>>
> >>>     Show the syscall name in "resuming interrupted call" message
> >>
> >> It's nice when it works, but you've broken ARM and probably other
> >> architectures:
> >>
> >> $ ./strace true
> >> pid 1234 stray syscall exit
> >> Segmentation fault
> > 
> > SPARC has also suffered from this change:
> > 
> > sparc$ ./strace -e, true
> > syscall: unknown syscall trap 1a80000d f7aceb48
> > +++ exited with 0 +++
> > 
> > Not as fatal as on ARM, but enough to trigger bexecve.test failure.
> 
> I am on it. Sorry. Should have tested it in qemu...

Thanks.
v4.10-43-g430143b made it pass all tests on a real sparc system, too.

Any ideas why on ALPHA and MIPS scno == 516, and on S390/S390X
scno == -516 instead of 0 when attaching to a sleeping process?


-- 
ldv

Attachment: pgpBifqZs4s8f.pgp
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Strace-devel mailing list
Strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel

Reply via email to