Re: Request go ahead for structural changes in CVS

2001-03-20 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only restriction would be where the Struts build.xml looked for build.properties. My proposal would be that it should be in the same directory that build.xml is (but, as mentioned earlier, *not* checked in to CVS). That way, you can have

Missing *.do (was Running Unpacked struts-example in WLS6.0)

2001-03-20 Thread Open Source
This should *not* be necessary. Even though the html:form tag lists the action as "/saveRegistration", the generated HTML page should be submitting to "/saveRegistration.do" instead (assuming that you have included the regular mapping for the "*.do" pattern). Could you do a "View Source" on

Re: BeanMessage Tag proposal

2001-03-20 Thread Pierre Delisle
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: I'm doing a little experimenting with the various styles to doing this -- and not just for bean:message arguments. It would be interesting to see if we can define a bean:setProperty property="xxx" value="yyy"/ tag that sets the corresponding property on the tag