DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13279] - Getting InsertTag not to swallow exceptions

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16442] - JSP in non-default module cannot call actions in that module

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16442. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13279] - Getting InsertTag not to swallow exceptions

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13279] - Getting InsertTag not to swallow exceptions

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13279] - Getting InsertTag not to swallow exceptions

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Cracking the whip

2003-01-27 Thread James Turner
Hey folks, if we're going to go for the Valentine's Day Release Massacre, we need to get the last 5 bugs closed. Any progress to report by anyone? James Turner Owner Manager, Black Bear Software, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Author: MySQL JSP Web Applications: Data Driven Programming

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS] The old In and Out

2003-01-27 Thread Hal Deadman
I am used to dealing with EJBs so I am probably not as sympathetic as I should have been to people that have written web applications without EJBs. In a sense, the business logic code in those non-EJB web apps is hidden away from other applications that might want to use it, without copying it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13279] - Getting InsertTag not to swallow exceptions

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13279. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS] The old In and Out

2003-01-27 Thread Kevin . Bedell
I can see the appeal of exposing the web application's code as web services using Axis. It seems like exposing Action classes directly as web services will be more trouble than it's worth. It would seem better to move the code in the Action class into another class (not tied to Struts/Web)

RE: [AXIS4STRUTS] The old In and Out

2003-01-27 Thread Mike Oliver
Hal, I started this thread thinking not in terms of a holistic optimal architecture but a simple lightweight generic Axis access method. I completely concur with you and others that if requirements drive a ground up architectural integration of a combination of User Access and Application access

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16464] New: - indexed attribute with submit tag generating bad HTML

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16464] - indexed attribute with submit tag generating bad HTML

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16464] - indexed attribute with submit tag generating bad HTML

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16464] - indexed attribute with submit tag generating bad HTML

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16464] - indexed attribute with submit tag generating bad HTML

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Action question

2003-01-27 Thread Travis Chase
Great I see where that code is happening, so my next question is if the Digester loads all the actions what is the purpose of having the RequestProcessor do the same thing? -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 12:47 AM

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16442] - JSP in non-default module cannot call actions in that module

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16442. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16480] New: - HTML Text should accept body-content as a

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16480. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16442] - JSP in non-default module cannot call actions in that module

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16442. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16480] - HTML Text should accept body-content as a

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16480. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Can't commit.

2003-01-27 Thread David Graham
Curse Microsoft and they're dreaded viruses! I've had network problems all day because of that SQL Server virus and now I can't commit a simple patch. Sorry, just had to vent. Dave _ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16464] - indexed attribute with submit tag generating bad HTML

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16464. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html FormTag.java

2003-01-27 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/01/27 21:18:03 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html FormTag.java Log: Output hidden token field in XHTML if necessary. Revision ChangesPath 1.43 +13 -7 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/FormTag.java Index:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15736] - Struts doesn't initialize under strict security manager

2003-01-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15736. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-27 Thread David Graham
Maybe I'm displaying gross ignorance here but AFAIK a synchronized block grabs the object's monitor and blocks other threads from calling *synchronized* methods on that object, right? Unsynchronized methods on that object can be called at will. I'm looking at LookupDispatchAction for PR

Re: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-27 Thread David Graham
The synch. blocks do only allow one thread through that section at a time which may be the intended behavior. It still seems like the member variable Maps should be synchronized. Lack of sleep has some negative affects sometimes... Dave From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:

Re: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 22:33:39 -0700 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Synchronized blocks? Maybe I'm displaying gross ignorance here but AFAIK a synchronized

Re: Synchronized blocks?

2003-01-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: Maybe I'm displaying gross ignorance here but AFAIK a synchronized block grabs the object's monitor and blocks other threads from calling *synchronized* methods on that object, right? Unsynchronized methods on that object can be called at will. To