rleland 2003/06/25 23:10:30
Modified:contrib/struts-legacy/src/conf MANIFEST.MF
Log:
Fix so Extension-Name: is org.apache.struts.legacy not
org.apache.struts.Struts Legacy ...
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1
The Gump build is going to fail again, tomorrow morning, I have been
babysitting
the different gump machines.
I'd appreciate it if someone that has the time could see what I am missing.
I have been tweaking the struts build.xml and it looks like it should
really work.
The only funny thing is
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Rob Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd appreciate it if someone that has the time could see what I am
missing.
a work tag for the compiled legacy classes - I'll see what I can do
to fix the struts build on my personal Gump installation and will
commit an updated Gump
[RESEND as I used the wrong sender address the first time and the mail
is now stuck in the moderation queue.]
On 26 Jun 2003, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll see what I can do to fix the struts build on my personal Gump
installation and will commit an updated Gump descriptor (and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21088.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21104.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21104.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin,
Since you're still engaged with FileUpload (bless you!), I cobbled up a
release plan (with you as Release Manager) and will post a vote, so that
this can be ready and waiting for you =:0)
-Ted.
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
I've got a release of my own
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Why it is wrote that struts examples shall operate successfully in tomcat
4.1.18 whereas it is the 4.1.24 which is the current production release for
servlet 2.3 / JSP 1.2 ???
I'm not commiter but you have my +0 !!
Arnaud.
-Message d'origine-
De : Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21104.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20265.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since no significant issues have arisen in response to Struts 1.1 RC2, I
propose that we release the tip of the main trunk in CVS as the Struts
1.1 Final release. I have checked in a proposed release plan, which is
available for review on the Struts
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nicolas De Loof wrote:
Just a question about releasse process : it seems 1.1 has too much
fonctional enhancements to quickly get a release,
and I've read here that future versions will get less improvement, so
that it can be release a simplier way. How will
commiters decide future
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release
Since no significant issues have arisen in response to Struts 1.1 RC2,
I
propose that we release the tip of the main
Vote: Struts 1.1 Final Release Plan
[X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
[ ] -1 I am against this proposal (must include a reason).
+1
-James
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release
Since no significant issues have arisen in response to Struts 1.1 RC2, I
propose that we release the tip of the
On Thursday 26 June 2003 07:42, Ted Husted wrote:
--
Vote: Struts 1.1 Final Release Plan
[X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help
Moving forward, if someone were to start to add another enhancement (or
product change) while another was already unreleased in the nightly
build, I would veto the change and force a point release. (And if I
didn't I'm sure someone else around here now would.) The justification
being that
--
Vote: Struts 1.1 Final Release Plan
[X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
[ ] -1
I'm looking at fixes for
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21091
1. Synchronize the entire RequestUtils.getModulePrefixes() method.
OR
2. The first thing the method does is checks for prefixes in the context
String[] prefixes = (String[]) context.getAttribute(PREFIXES_KEY);
I don't think synchronization is the answer for this one. The general problem is
that while one thread is running through the enumeration returned from
ServletContext.getAttributeNames, another thread adds or removes an application
scoped attribute. Even if you successfully lock down this method,
--- Kris Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think synchronization is the answer for this one. The general
problem is
that while one thread is running through the enumeration returned from
ServletContext.getAttributeNames, another thread adds or removes an
application
scoped
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1!!!
Hurray!!!
Craig
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:42:37 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release
Since no significant issues have arisen
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
--
Vote: Struts 1.1 Final Release Plan
[X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it
[ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it
I'm not talking about updating existing attributes. As long as the method has to
invoke ServletContext.getAttributeNames and loop through the enumeration (even
if it's just once within a synchronized method or block), it's possible to
trigger the error. The collection that backs that enumeration
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21127.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Oh, forgot to comment!
I am not sure if the following discussion helps. But I realized that a lot of
people don't read mail on the struts-users list.
Making a copy of the collection seems to fix the problem for me.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21127.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tomsk,
I don't know how to make this happen myself, but I'll forward this to the
Struts Developer list and one of those folks will be able to help.
Craig
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:54:10 +0200
From: Thomas Diesler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Martin,
Since you're still engaged with FileUpload (bless you!), I cobbled up a
release plan (with you as Release Manager) and will post a vote, so that
this can be ready and waiting for you =:0)
Thanks for doing this, Ted, that's great.
FileUpload
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Tomsk,
I don't know how to make this happen myself, but I'll forward this to the
Struts Developer list and one of those folks will be able to help.
I can make that happen. Since it often takes a few days, I'd prefer to
hold off until Struts
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[RESEND as I used the wrong sender address the first time and the mail
is now stuck in the moderation queue.]
On 26 Jun 2003, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll see what I can do to fix the struts build on my personal Gump
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16764.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16764.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: struts-lagacy.jar on ibiblio/maven
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21134.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
56 matches
Mail list logo
