I believe at one time we were going to deprecate ActionErrors since it
is really a shell over ActionMessages. We could still keep the
error tag, just make it use ActionMessages directly.
[ ] +1 Yes deprecate ActionErrors
[ ] 0 Yes, but you'll have to face the angry crowds yourself.
[ ] -1 No,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22231.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
David == David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David While we're somewhat on this topic I'd like to get some clarification on
David the build process. Why do struts-el and struts-legacy get built with the
David standard Struts build file? Struts-EL has *never* built on my machine
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could
you tell me ? Thanks~~
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist
http://www.struts-atlanta.org
678.910.8017
AIM:jmitchtx
-Original Message-
From:
Can anyone on the dev list shed some light on the following Q?
When could the JavaBean be a String type?
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Erez Efrati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 6, 2003 3:33 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: Validator
I am trying to figure
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22261.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've created some patches to try this out and attached them to Bugzilla.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22267
Sorry about the multiple patch files, but WS Studio wouldn't play ball.
I haven't touched Action...yet ;-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Steve Raeburn
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Robert Leland wrote:
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:42:43 -0400
From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: When is the next release?
Ted Husted wrote:
Just a head's up.
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 09 Aug 2003 18:12:19 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote:
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 20:10:16 -0700
From: Steve Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: When is the next release?
-Original
At 12:01 -0400 8/6/03, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Good point! I ran originally ran into the resource bundle problem a long
time ago, and forgot that there are other application-wide settings that
would be nice to inherit from module to module.
1) Declarative Exception Handling (global-exceptions) - in
rleland 2003/08/09 19:52:55
Modified:web/example/WEB-INF struts-config-registration.xml
struts-config.xml
Log:
Use standard prexisting ELEMENTS description and display-name,
instead of description-short description-long.
-Rob
Revision Changes
dmkarr 2003/08/09 20:02:59
Modified:contrib/struts-el/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/logic
ELMatchSupport.java
Log:
Changed from RequestUtils to TagUtils.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +5 -5
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 09 Aug 2003 16:01:52 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs
sraeburn2003/08/09 23:00:49
Modified:contrib/struts-el build-webapp.xml build-tests.xml
build.properties.sample
doc/userGuide installation.xml configuration.xml
.build-all-clean.bat.sample build.xml
The Struts framework is not going to start losing it's shine. ;)
Struts is the most widely accepted web application framework in the
known universe. In all likelihood, more people use Struts than all other
frameworks combined. Not only by developers, but also by the tool
vendors, like
The tld is generated from the xml file. I thought I was going crazy when I
couldn't find the source tld files 8-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 10, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
I hope I wasn't being presumptive. You can always put it back if you want to
remove it :-)
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 10, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: When is the next release?
Steve Raeburn wrote:
At 12:30 -0400 8/6/03, Sgarlata Matt wrote:
Or did you mean I'm not modularizing my app well? Maybe so, but I still
think a notion of a Struts application could be beneficial.
No, I meant nothing like that.
IMHO, the conceptual issue is that there seems to be no
notion of a Struts application
Miscellaneous comments interspersed.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:43:16 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: When is the next release?
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º
Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could
you tell me ? Thanks~~
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist
http://www.struts-atlanta.org
678.910.8017
AIM:jmitchtx
-Original Message-
From:
dmkarr 2003/08/10 14:42:21
Modified:contrib/struts-el/doc/userGuide struts-html-el.xml
contrib/struts-el/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/html
ELRewriteTag.java ELRewriteTagBeanInfo.java
Log:
Added action attribute added in base class
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that still doesn't enable you to specify
one action forward= to be context relative and another module relative
within the same module as you can by using 'contextRelative' attribute on a
forward.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL
craigmcc2003/08/09 12:29:30
Modified:.build.xml
contrib/struts-el build.xml
contrib/struts-el/src/share/org/apache/strutsel/taglib/html
ELFormTag.java ELHtmlTag.java
ELJavascriptValidatorTag.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20761.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Maverick directly supports the idea that a command may have only one
destrintation, and then streamlines its behavior. So we have some
precedent under the great minds theory =:0)
ActionMapping.findForwards only brings back local forwards. So the
DefaultAction could just forward to the first
28 matches
Mail list logo
