DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jing Zhou wrote:
I am wondering how I could implement a jump behavior in the main
chain. The use case for a jump behavior is that the main chain should
continue with several commands skipped over. For example, I would like
to jump to the last command in the main chain after the current command.
Forwarded by Tetsuya Kitahata [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Original Message ---
From:jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:51:24 +0200
Subject: .htaccess in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21263.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It looks to me that I threw a disturbing idea. Now I change
the subject for more discussions of different opinions.
Craig mentioned the go to statement in programming
languages and hinted it could be an evil if Chain implement
the semantics of go to (I just called it jump behavior).
If we
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23605.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23605.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jing Zhou wrote:
* I studied several workflow engines (not page flow stuff, they
manage persisted workload for people) They all implement,
one way or another, the jump behavior. I could not see
they violate the OO design principles as high level
regulators.
I believe Chain is suppose
Here, I would refer you to commons 'functor' which contains all manner of
classes for implementing logic in terms of object instances.
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:57 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts-chain
Jing Zhou wrote:
It looks to me that I threw a disturbing idea. Now I change
the subject for more discussions of different opinions.
Craig mentioned the go to statement in programming
languages and hinted it could be an evil if Chain implement
the semantics of go to (I just called it jump
arron 2003/10/03 22:23:54
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested NestedRootTag.java
Log:
Fix for what appears to be the real reason behind bug
#17977. Problem re-noted and fixed by Tibor Varga.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +5 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17977.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
12 matches
Mail list logo