NestedCheckboxTag

2002-01-08 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
Arron, I just had the need to have a NestedCheckboxTag. Maybe you should include it. cheers, tomK nested-checkbox.zip Description: nested-checkbox.zip -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Nested tags

2002-01-07 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
For the record: I've been playing with Arron's nested tags for a while now, and they seem OK to me. I've had the occasional what the #$%#@ when something didn't work as I expected, but after thinking about it the reason was obvious. This situation occurs with most struts tags (for me, in any

RE: Nested tags: radio problem

2001-12-20 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
what you mean by the [something] either. Give the above a bash and hopefully it'll become clear. Keeping in mind that if you do the above to a parent tag, all it's children will nest on from the parent. It's all in Package.html. :) Arron Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) wrote: Hi Arron

nested : NestedPropertyHelper

2001-12-20 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
Auch Arron, Are you sure all those instanceof checks are a good idea? Adding another nested tag would require you to adapt the NestedPropertyHelper, which isn't clean design IMHO. And I wouldn't have noticed this if I wasn't checking an NestedIterate bug. nested:iterate behaves differently than

RE: nested : NestedPropertyHelper

2001-12-20 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
-Original Message- From: Arron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: donderdag 20 december 2001 15:25 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: nested : NestedPropertyHelper [snip] I also removed the check for the select tag. I had it there from when there was no

RE: How to extract multiple columns of data in an logic:iterate tag ?

2001-12-13 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
I have submitted a patch once for solving this, but it seems to not have made it in CVS. Here's the patch again (against current CVS) hth, tomK -Original Message- From: Uladzimir Kavalchuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: donderdag 13 december 2001 12:44 To: 'Struts Users Mailing

RE: Freetext attribute for all tags...

2001-12-10 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
I'd prefer literal. freetext calls the notion of do what you want, but it is of course do what html wants. custom calls the notion of you have to program this yourself, which isn't the case. And verbatim is a close second, but not as English as literal imho. Just my opinion tomK

RE: Exception handling --- suggestion for improvements ---- (e.g., templatetag masks original exception) correction in sample code

2001-11-16 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
no such feature whatsoever. For my defense, I can say that Sun should use the @since tag more often ;) tomK -Original Message- From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) Sent: vrijdag 16 november 2001 9:49 To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: Exception handling --- suggestion

RE: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items)

2001-11-13 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
Ok, sorry, I must have misread something... tomK -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: maandag 12 november 2001 23:27 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items) Arron wrote: Thanks for the

RE: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items)

2001-11-12 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
-Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: zaterdag 10 november 2001 11:59 To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items) [...] Again, in general, I would like to see the core Struts framework kept

FW: Form properties reset ?

2001-10-22 Thread Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay)
I've sent this to struts-user, but nobody seems to know the answer. Could the people that have defined this behaviour, shed some light on this? Thanks, tomK -Original Message- From: Tom Klaasen (TeleRelay) Sent: vrijdag 19 oktober 2001 17:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Form