raham1980@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
>
>
> I understand the behavior you want and the reason you want
> it. You stated
> that :
>
> "both Struts
elopers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:10:25 -0800
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
>
t: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
>
>
> It seems that
As Craig pointed out, we decided some time ago not to support
the idea of page-relative paths. Why? Because the "pages" are
often in one place and the actions are "in" another. The action
"path" is not really a file path or an URL it is simply a URI.
People tend to dress up like it was an URL
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
>
>
> It seems that the only use of the requested behavior is to
&g
Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:29:11 -0800
Thanks for your comments-- I ha
10/28/2002 5:42:41 PM, David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm still not convinced we need the behavior you desire. The
value of
>struts html tags comes from the ability to use a form bean to
populate input
>elements. Without being able to use a form bean
the tags are
>pretty useless
Thanks for your comments-- I have some responses below.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
>
>
> The state
Thanks for your input. My comments below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@;apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:23 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
>
>
>
>
&g
PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:54:29 -0800
I thought I addressed the form bean instance
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:54:29 -0800
> From: "Taylor, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
ute started with a slash. I think the latter
is better, but I'd like to know if anyone has an opinion before I offer a
patch. Any ideas?
-JT
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
--using tiles and container managed security/form based login -see below
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@;apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:14 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
&
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Alan P Sexton wrote:
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:20:36 +
> From: Alan P Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [SURVEY] HREF attr
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:21:51 -0800
My first thought was you cou
rm to be submitted across modules as with
ActionForward.
-JT
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@;apache.org]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] HREF attribute for FormTag
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason
Here is a problem which _MIGHT_ benefit from the proposal. I am still
too much of a newbie to be sure but haven't found any discussion of it
in the lists or docs
I'm using container managed security with form authentication. Because
of the context path prepending problem, I can't use FormTag for
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Taylor, Jason wrote:
> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:38:21 -0800
> From: "Taylor, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Su
Hi all--
There have been two bugs (#12600, #13871) logged against the form tag for
the behavior of its getActionMappingUrl method, which always prepends the
context path.
Other html tags that produce a URL that is sent to the browser such as
LinkTag and ImgTag give the user at least the option
19 matches
Mail list logo
