It's not so much a bug as a design flaw. The current approach to
prepending the module is under-designed and just jams it in.
Though, I keep meaning to check whether the template feature we
added later ($M$P) could be used to get around this somehow.
-Ted.
12/17/2002 12:22:39 PM, Matt Raible
Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the limitation
that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather than
path-mapping (/do/*)?
If this has been fixed, please let me know.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing) for the limitation
that modules can only be used with extension-mapping (*.do) rather than
path-mapping (/do/*)?
I don't see a bug report for that in Bugzilla, so feel free to submit an
enhancement
Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Module path-mapping limitation
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Is there a bug that I can reference (in my writing
