Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-28 Thread Ted Husted
Robert Leland wrote: Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be 100%. I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the 1.1.0 version which has released in Augustand been designated an

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-28 Thread Robert Leland
Ted Husted wrote: Robert Leland wrote: Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be 100%. I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the 1.1.0 version which has released in Augustand been

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread James Mitchell
+1 -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 770.822.3359 AIM:jmitchtx - Original Message - From: Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:14 PM Subject: [Short Term Plan] Struts

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread David Graham
I agree 100%. +1 to using commons-validator 1.1.0. David --- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be 100%. I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status is to make the nightly build of struts

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread James Holmes
+1 Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be 100%. I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the 1.1.0 version which has released in August and been designated an Alpha. I propose

RE: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread James Turner
Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0 +1 Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be 100%. I feel the only way to really

RE: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread David Graham
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0 +1 Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be 100%. I feel the only way to really promote

RE: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread James Turner
- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:35 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: RE: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0 Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use ActionErrors because

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Robert Leland
David Graham wrote: Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use ActionErrors because the ActionForm.validate() method returns an instance of that class. ActionMessage should be used instead of ActionError though. Eventually we'll need to add a method that will allow

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Sgarlata Matt
: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0 David Graham wrote: Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use ActionErrors because the ActionForm.validate() method returns an instance of that class

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread Ted Husted
Maybe we can wait until it's time to add a form of validate that will just take a mutable ActionContext and return void, and deprecate it all at once. Robert Leland wrote: David Graham wrote: Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors. We still need to use ActionErrors because the

Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on Validator 1.1.0

2003-09-26 Thread David Graham
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe we can wait until it's time to add a form of validate that will just take a mutable ActionContext and return void, and deprecate it all at once. Well, ActionError was easily replaced with ActionMessage. Also, I updated most references to