At 14:03 12.09.2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Done.
>
>Ceki, I also added a slightly briefer note that should clarify the problem
>was in the Struts packaging, not in Log4J. Is the new wording OK for you?
Yes, thank you.
>Craig
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustne
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:36:04 -0400
> From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Packaging error
From: Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Packaging error
>>
>>
>>Craig,
>>
>>Thanks for the immediate response. If possi
At 10:06 11.09.2002 -0700, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>Be happy to, but Ted's got the permissions on the README.html file set to
>644 :-<. Ted, can you please add a clarification on this (and fix your
>umask to 002 so that file permissions come out as 664)?
Thanks.
> > On an unrelated register
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:29:53 +0200
> From: Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Packaging error
>
>
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Donald Ball wrote:
> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:56:45 -0400
> From: Donald Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Packa
Craig,
Thanks for the immediate response. If possible, I would like the
warning text to include the following.
The problem is not caused by log4j but with the particular way
Struts-1.1-b2 was built. The problem will be solved in future releases
of Struts.
On an unrelated register,
On 9/11/2002 at 8:47 AM Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>Ceki,
>
>It was nothing wrong with Log4J -- the person who built the Struts release
>built commons-logging.jar from scratch, but without Log4J in his build
>environment (so the Log4J wrapper classes weren't included).
>
>The final Struts release
Ceki,
It was nothing wrong with Log4J -- the person who built the Struts release
built commons-logging.jar from scratch, but without Log4J in his build
environment (so the Log4J wrapper classes weren't included).
The final Struts release will include final releases of the Commons
packages it rel
