+1 on this!!
You hit the nail on the head. Many people (mostly managers) are reluctant
to adopt Struts add-ons because they are not perceived as having the same
tried and true stamp as the official Struts core. I think doing this
would be a huge boon for Struts and would foster a lot of the
Build Easier)
James Holmes wrote:
+1 on this!!
You hit the nail on the head. Many people (mostly managers) are reluctant
to adopt Struts add-ons because they are not perceived as having the same
tried and true stamp as the official Struts core. I think doing this
would be a huge boon
+1 for TLP
+1 Craig VP
-James
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project
Following up on a brief thread on this list in December [1], Craig, Ted
and
+1
Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through struts. In fact it may be
100%.
I feel the only way to really promote commons-validator to Beta status
is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the 1.1.0 version which
has released in August
and been designated an Alpha. I propose
I noticed that many of the HTML Tag Library tags have alt and altKey
attributes available. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think only the
img tag in HTML has that option. Any reason not to remove them from
tags whose HTML counterpart doesn't support it?
-James
We most definitely accept patches. The more the merrier.
Note, you should open a Bugzilla ticket to attach the patches to instead
of sending the patches to this list. That way we don't lose track of
them.
-James
I use javadoc a lot, as with most java developers. When I use the
struts
+1
I've met Don and he'll be a welcome edition to the team.
-James
Don has been involved with Struts for quite some time and has submitted
numerous patches and enhancements. I believe that as we move forward
with development, having Don on our team would be a tremendous asset.
I would
+1
-James
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Final Release
Since no significant issues have arisen in response to Struts 1.1 RC2, I
propose that we release the tip of the
about Project Rave?
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:51:40 -0400, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Glenn,
There's actually been some really exciting JavaServer Faces tools news
at JavaOne. First, there's Project Rave from Sun which looks really
close to the Visual Studio stuff from Microsoft
I'd recommend you have a look at JavaServer Faces (JSF). I'm at JavaOne
right now and Sun -- along with other vendors -- is putting some serious
resources into developer productivity by way of JSF. I have put
together a page on my website with more info on Java Server Faces:
-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:19 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Struts can't get its act together - JavaPro
I'd recommend you have a look at JavaServer Faces (JSF). I'm at JavaOne
right now and Sun -- along with other vendors
Yep, I'm definitely not abandoning Struts either. I am in the middle of
some nice new features for Struts Console.
Stay tuned.
-James
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Struts
+1 to RC2
-James
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:57 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June
+1. Let's do it!
-James
- Original Message -
From: James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with FileUpload Beta 2
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL
I know this was brought up some time in the past when
I was looking at updating the Struts website to the
pretty format generated by Maven. Perhaps there
will be time and place for it once 1.1 is out.
-James
--- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else looked at developing a Maven
Well, we're all entitled to our own opinion. However,
mine differs from yours as I think the other format is
much clearer and easier to read.
-James
--- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this was brought up some time in the past
when
I was looking at updating the Struts website to
+1
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While *we all* put a lot of time and effort into
getting 1.1 ready for
its first release candidate, it seems to me that
David Graham really
came through for us over the last few weeks (months,
even).
As a token of our appreciation, I'd like to
+1
-james
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All outstanding bugs against Struts 1.1 have either
been fixed or been
categorized for fixing in a release subsequent to
Struts 1.1 Final.
Therefore, I propose that we release the tip of the
main trunk in CVS as
Release Candidate 1 for
Bugzilla.
File a report against Struts with a subject line
starting with [PATCH].
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla
-james
--- Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where do you submit patches for Strus-Dev?
Which web page?
Also is the `Bugzilla New Account' working?
I tried
+1
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
I said that I don't want to debate on this. I
know the reformated code
doesn't follow the recomanded Jakarta rules code
standard. But another
rule is to respect any other well formated
Thanks for the report. I too had heard that there was
Struts support in the new IDEs, but haven't had the
chance to see it yet.
-james
--- Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
JBuilder 8, available soon will provide some Struts
wizard, I've got the beta so I check
thisand
Struts Console too.
-james
--- Emmanuel Boudrant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is time to start packaging tools and
generators with Struts to
help the developer
Thats a really good initiative
Easy Struts will be volunteer ;)
-emmanuel
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL
Perhaps that should be:
DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED
DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED
instead of the lower case. Just to enforce the point.
People tend to overlook things alot.
-james
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rleland 2002/11/14
Cool...I just thought it would help save us some time
on the mailing lists.
-james
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Holmes wrote:
Perhaps that should be:
DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED
DEPRECATED
DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED DEPRECATED
DEPRECATED
I think it would be nice if we could run a nightly
process that ran after the other nightly processes and
created an archive that had all of the other nightlies
in it.
-james
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Karr, David wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002
I wholeheatedly agree. Just had to redo my
environment on a new machine.
+1.
-james
--- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to work on source patches so I'm
setting up my build
environment for testing purposes. I've found this
exercise both mundane and
time consuming.
Looks good, however, like Ted says we're headed
towards Maven which has new LnF/stylesheets for
Jakarta sites. I spent some time taking the
stylesheets/graphics from Maven-built sites and
applying them to Struts. It looked great. I'm no CSS
wizard though and had a couple outstanding issues
+1
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As these methods are really not part of the public
API, could
we not just change them now and be done with it?
-Ted.
10/28/2002 1:21:40 PM, Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See Ted's response to my very same question a couple
of days ago.
-james
--- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My idea is that the ValidatorActionForm and
ValidatorForm (why are there 2?)
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert
Just curious why there are 2 classes? Seems like the
DynaValidatorActionForm could go away. It simply
overrides the validate() method in the parent. Why
do we need 2 implementations of validate()?
-james
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let
submit a documentation enhancement request in
Bugzilla.
See the section on the below page called Contributing
Patches to Code or Documentation.
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/
-james
--- Thomas L Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WebSphere Studio has Struts tooling, so we'd like to
put a
to go would be some type of
switch as we have for whether action input
is a path or a forward name.
-Ted.
10/23/2002 11:17:09 AM, James Holmes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious why there are 2 classes?
Seems like the
DynaValidatorActionForm could go away.
It simply
+1.
--- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need
the xhtml attribute for
the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and
older browsers, I think
the tags should produce it every time. Many people
do not use the
html:html tag so it
+1
--- Hajratwala, Nayan (N.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
good discussion, everyone ...
I've been thinking about this a little more and I'm
going to backtrack a
little bit We will very likely be running into
this same problem when
XHTML 2.0 comes out. XHTML 2.0 will NOT be
backwards
+1
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Mitchell has been a long-time
contributor of good ideas as well as
patches on the developer list. He is also
generous with his help on the user list.
I believe it's time that we nominated
James as a Committer. After all, we can
+1
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE
AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13792.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED
AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am using IE 6.0. Hmm...strange.
As far as I know, IE only likes to have one version
installed at once.
-james
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Homes wrote:
I just checked the latest nightly build and the
//-- is showing up on the Register and Logon
pages
of the
Can you use cvs diff -u to do your diffs? I can't
do much with the one you posted. If you send it in
the right format I'll get it committed.
-james
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE
AT
+1
--- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like StrutsValidatorUtil StrutsValidator
really
belong in o.a.s.validator
so I propose to deprecated
o.a.s.util.StrutsValidator
o.a.s.util.StrutsValidatorUtil
and copy them to
Duplicates should be marked as such and not just
closed. In bugzilla you can close a bug as a
duplicate of another. I think that's what you should
do here.
-james
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE
Are you sure this is all fixed now??
If you run the example app there is some spurious
output from the JavaScript stuff I believe you are
working on.
// End -- shows up on the bottom of the page.
http://localhost:8080/struts-example/logon.jsp
-james
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY
Here's the query I use:
that be official?
It does not have Validator (8787 for example, or
other commons, but if
is or even close than OK, let's see what we can do.
(James are you a commiter? I just want to know how
official this is)
.V
James Holmes wrote:
Here's the query I use:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla
+1
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David has been a very involved member of the Struts
community for some time, and has been making steady
contributions both to the mailing list and to
Bugzilla. I think this would be a good time to bring
David on as a
Committer,
He has my +1
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/cvsindex.html
Go to the bottom of the page and look at the Full
Remote CVS Access section.
-james
--- Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just trying to login (via ssh) to
cvs.apache.org to (WT!)
change my password and received the following error.
Hey Jon,
You've followed the right process. Unfortunately many
of us are very busy with life outside of Struts and
can't get to the bugs in the bug list as soon as they
are opened. I will try and take care of these
tonight.
-james
--- Jon Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I
+1
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to propose David M. Karr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as a committer on
Struts. It's clear from his work on the EL library
that he would be a
tremendous asset to the Struts development community
(and not just for
these tags :-).
Here's
Martin-
Are you sure you updated the website for the release
of 1.1b2? When you pull up the main Struts home page
it still lists 1.1b1 underneath the Acquiring Struts
section.
Unfortunately I don't have access to CVS right or
otherwise I'd update the file myself.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help
support it
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
__
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
http://www.hotjobs.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
+1
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me. However, rather than
submitting an updated
copy of the DTD, what I would suggest is that you
open a bug report at
Bugzilla, and add a patch as an
Questions like this are not for this mailing list.
You should post this to the Struts Users mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope that helps.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Sachin Mapara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Could anyone help me out on the following
This message should be directed to the Struts Users
mailing list and not this list. This list is for the
development of the core Struts code, not for
applications built using Struts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Shanthan Sivapalan
[EMAIL
to tinker with
it. The pages look really good with the new Lf.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds fair to me.
-james
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2002, James Holmes wrote
These types of questions are best directed to the
Struts Users' mailing list. This list is solely for
the discussion of the development of the actual core
Struts Code, not developing Struts applications, etc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope that helps.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These types of questions are best directed to the
Struts Users' mailing list. This list is solely for
the discussion of the development of the actual core
Struts Code, not developing Struts applications, etc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hope that helps.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as binary in
the nightly build. Maybe we can left a README file
saying that Tiles are
now in the main distribution.
Cedric
James Holmes wrote:
I closed out bug 7347 tonight, which was for
removing
Validator from the contrib directory. I think it
makes sense to do this for Tiles
Tim--
Thanks for volunteering to tackle this.
Unfortunately, someone has already beaten you to the
punch. Follow this link for details:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5518
If you'd like to jump in and help out I would
recommend going into bugzilla and tackling some bugs.
This sounds like an enhancement to me.
Anybody else??
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE
AT
I closed out bug 7347 tonight, which was for removing
Validator from the contrib directory. I think it
makes sense to do this for Tiles as well. It can be
confusing for anyone new to the project to see what
appears to be a duplication of code.
I know we're still working the kinks out of the
Jesper--
Thanks for taking the time to submit your request.
The best way to formalize this is to use the Bugzilla
bug/feature database so that the request is not lost
and you get notified when the bug/feature is decided
on.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1, for consistency in nomenclature.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the syntax for the module path pattern, we
originally used $A$P which
could stand for application/path.
If we are going with the module
Can someone update the website docs when they get
chance :) There's been lots of news lately and other
changes.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
Thanks for bringing light to this Craig. I brought
this up awhile back and got no response. There has
been some discussion on the Users' list as well about
this. A couple of the people on the Users' list have
posted tools generated DTDs. I'll forward those
messages to the dev list and that
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
http://sbc.yahoo.com
---BeginMessage---
Hi all,
by the way last night I wrote down the DTDs for validation.xml
and validator-rules.xml
Hope it
While we're on the subject of DTDs I wanted to propose
that we rename the Tiles DTD from tiles-config.dtd to
tiles-config_1_1.dtd to be consistent. Now that Tiles
is in the core I think there should be a distinction
between versions of the DTDs. Already the Tiles DTD
has more than one
of salt. I think
it would be *FAR*
better to derive them by looking at the digester
code and the associated
attribute sets. If it would be of help, I can do
this by the end of
this week.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday
This is something Ted Husted proposed on the dev list
awhile back. I think it makes sense and would help
partition the messages.
Ted, what do we have to do to get this rolling?
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Mark Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
Kedar--
These types of question are best asked on the Struts
Users mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Kedar Upadhye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
One simple question about the action handler class.
I have a form here
Andres,
These questions are best directed to the Struts Users
mailing list.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Andres Angelani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Supose you have a Tiles component definition
composed (a) by two JSP pages.
There's
Can you submit this to Bugzilla using cvs diff -u.
This way we can track it take care of it.
Thanks,
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adds my book, which includes a chapter on Struts.
James Index: books.xml
Bugzilla is the best way to submit bugs and
enhancements.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
Of course attaching code to the bug/enhancements
always helps too.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Mirko Maischberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think i've acted in
Not sure if it was on purpose or not (assuming not),
but the news page (on the site) seems to have reverted
back to a version from January of this year.
I haven't made an attempt to correct the file as I
don't know if someone is in the middle of something.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig/Ted:
The 1.1 config file DTD at:
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_1.dtd
is out of sync. It is cvs version 1.16 and the latest
cvs version is 1.18.
Not sure if there is a way to automate the process of
keeping the cvs and web versions in sync.
-james
[EMAIL
?listName=struts-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=8439
* New Committer: James Holmes
James Holmes, author of the popular Struts Console
tool, was proposed as
a committer by Ted Husted [9] and was accepted
unanimously.
[9]
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=struts-
[EMAIL
Will do. I'll take care of both of these issues today
and commit them tonight.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
From
Can you please open a bug for this at:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
Please include about what container this occurs on
(i.e. Tomcat, WebLogic, etc).
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Mete Kural [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Struts Committers,
Just
I'm not aware of anything that accomplishes what
you're looking for, however, I've never gone looking
for it either :)
I would try looking at the JSTL stuff. Struts is
headed that way.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey
While we're on the subject of Struts and Tiles can
someone, with privilege to do so, add the Tiles dtd to
the jakarta.apache.org/dtds/ directory.
This is being referenced in the config files, but it
returns a 403 forbidden when you try to access it.
+1 and more than happy to help with bugs and docs.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in
1.1, and improve the
existing documentation, with a goal to release a
beta 2 of
that James
Holmes was
also working actively on this bug.
-Rob
Hal Deadman wrote:
The subject of this email doesn't seem to match the
body but if you are
referring to bug reports about the multipart
requests and forwarding, there
are a couple in bugzilla already.
http
Before I commit the patch for this bug I wanted to see
what the group thinks about changing the functionality
of this method.
Are we going to be breaking any code anywhere? I
don't think we will, but just wanted to run it up the
flag pole first.
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
---BeginMessage---
+1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Was just updating some code in Struts Console and
noticed that the message-resources element doesn't
allow for child set-property elements. This seems
to be an oversight to me as every other major element
has this.
Shouldn't users be able to set properties on those
classes too? I think so.
The nightly build JavaDocs appear to be out of sync.
Do these get updated automagically each night when the
builds are created?
If not, can someone with website update privilege
update these?
Thanks,
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
Hey Arron,
Do you know anything about bug 9314? Can it be closed?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9314
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH
Should this bug be closed as WONTFIX or should this
actually be implemented.
My inclination is towards closing it as WONTFIX;
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6096
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
__
There wasn't an announcement that I know of. I was
simply taking an entry from the bug db. Are you
saying that I should make an announcement and then add
it to the news page?
-james
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was there an announcement to go with this?
What I've been trying to
Is this something we can fix? This is something I
noticed as well and forgot to mention to Cedric or the
group.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Struts Newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Tiles DTD doesn't exist
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig:
Do you know anything about this? He says you posted
some build file and it doesn't work. I'm thinking
this bug should probably be closed since build.xml in
CVS works fine.
BTW, got access from Brian B. this afternoon.
-james
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL,
I think this bug can be closed as WONTFIX, but would
like the opinion of others. I submitted my commments
in Bugzilla.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4776
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
__
Do You
Tomas,
These types of questions are best asked on the Struts
users mailing list. This list is not meant for these
types of questions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Struts-dev Newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Subject: Validator's (fields)
Daniel,
Take a look at the DynaActionForm stuff in Struts 1.1b
or the nightly builds. The DynaActionForm can handle
dynamic form fields.
There has been much discussion about this lately on
the user list. Take a look at the archives to find
past messages.
This is because there is a *bug* in the DispatchAction
in 1.1b1 and the nightly builds. Currently the
DispatchAction does not support the new Exceptions
facility in Struts 1.1. There is already a bug in
Bugzilla for this and I have submitted a patch. I
will be applying the patch to the Struts
Here's the bug report:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8022
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is because there is a *bug* in the
DispatchAction
in 1.1b1 and the nightly builds. Currently
Sandra--
This message should be posted to the Struts Users
mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should also check the mailing lists archives as
their have been numerous posts in the past about
Authentication.
http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-user%40jakarta.apache.org/
Hope that helps,
I want to thank Ted for electing me to become a
committer and to thank everyone who has voted for me.
Im honored to have been selected.
Im anxious to dig in and make meaningful
contributions.
Thanks,
James Holmes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts
the weeks on
a monthly basis for
the Jakarta Newsletter.
If anyone wants to take a hand at this past week,
jump in.
James Holmes wrote:
This is exactly what I had in mind. We setup some
sort of rotation to alleviate the burden on one
person.
-james
--- Vikram Goyal01
I agree wholeheartedly with your first point.
However, I think that the second point might be a bad
thing. The reason I say this is because people
validate Struts based off of who's running/using it.
There's probably a question a week on the user list
where someone is trying to convince their
+++1.
I was hunting around last week for docs on how to use
the new Declaritive Exception stuff for integration
into Struts Console and having quick access to the
docs would have been very useful.
Just my .02.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL
Might want to consider theServerSide.com and/or
javalobby.org.
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martinc 01/11/16 11:04:37
Modified:doc release-plan-1.0.1.xml
Log:
Removed [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
mailing lists
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
