Re: OT: Struts JSR?

2004-03-21 Thread Nadeem Bitar
functionality. * Support for IoC. * Cleaner interfaces. * Workflow integration. * Chained actions * Support for portlet(JSR-168) nadeem bitar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: OT: Struts JSR?

2004-03-20 Thread Nadeem Bitar
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 17:47 -0500, Ted Husted wrote: On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:53:58 -0800, Nadeem Bitar wrote: If for example JSF 2.0 is available, and Spring Framework is well integrated with JSF before Struts 2.0 is available, I strongly believe that struts won't have a place and would

Re: OT: Struts JSR?

2004-03-20 Thread Nadeem Bitar
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 20:41 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: Quoting Thomas L Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED]: David Geary spoke on JSF at trijug.org M 15 Mar 04. My notes of his remarks include - Is JSF a replacement for Struts? Yes! - JSF is a standard. Struts will never be a

Re: OT: Struts JSR?

2004-03-19 Thread Nadeem Bitar
Since there is an overlap between struts and jsf, I highly doubt that Struts would be accepted as a JSR. I already expressed similar concerns regarding struts being replaced by JSF. I believe the open source community works faster than JCP and if struts want to be remain competitive and still