Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-16 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Ted Husted wrote: > I could work on implementing this if you like, Craig. That might free up > some of your time to refactor those "airplane notes" regarding the event > scripting (which I would dearly love to see ;0). > :-) The airplane notes are getting closer -- I ne

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-16 Thread Ted Husted
I could work on implementing this if you like, Craig. That might free up some of your time to refactor those "airplane notes" regarding the event scripting (which I would dearly love to see ;0). And, after all, I was the Pain-In-The-Ass that started the Commons thing in the first place, and shou

RE: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-16 Thread nuray . baskal
+1 -Original Message- From: craigmcc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sonntag, 15. Juli 2001 03:21 To: struts-dev Cc: craigmcc Subject: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the beanutils, collections, and digester pac

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-16 Thread Ted Husted
+1 "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the beanutils, collections, > and digester packages have been released under the Commons project. Now > that these are official 1.0 releases, I propose to modify the Struts 1.1 > environment to depend on these package

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-16 Thread Cedric Dumoulin
+1 Cedric "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the beanutils, collections, > and digester packages have been released under the Commons project. Now > that these are official 1.0 releases, I propose to modify the Struts 1.1 > environment to depend on

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-15 Thread Michael Mok
+1 Michael Mok www.teatimej.com - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 9:20 AM Subject: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages > As I cc'd to this

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-15 Thread Martin Cooper
+1. This is absolutely the right way to go. -- Martin Cooper - Original Message - From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 6:20 PM Subject: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages &g

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-15 Thread Oleg V Alexeev
Hello Craig, +1 Sunday, July 15, 2001, 5:20:33 AM, you wrote: CRM> As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the beanutils, collections, CRM> and digester packages have been released under the Commons project. Now CRM> that these are official 1.0 releases, I propose to modify the Struts 1.1

Re: [VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-14 Thread David Winterfeldt
+1 --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the > beanutils, collections, > and digester packages have been released under the > Commons project. Now > that these are official 1.0 releases, I propose to > modify the Struts 1.1 > environme

[VOTE] Changing Struts 1.1 to depend on Commons Packages

2001-07-14 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the beanutils, collections, and digester packages have been released under the Commons project. Now that these are official 1.0 releases, I propose to modify the Struts 1.1 environment to depend on these packages, instead of the internal Struts versions