r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:37 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Another bright idea, make "indexed" work with
> JSTL forEach and friends
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, James Turner wrote:
>
> >
ens in a Flash
plug in) can do limited OO)
.V
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On 4 Jan 2003, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 04 Jan 2003 17:28:58 -0800
From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anothe
her way)
>
> (OT: I was told that Flash (when one does data entery screens in a Flash
> plug in) can do limited OO)
>
> .V
>
>
>
> Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> >
> > On 4 Jan 2003, David M. Karr wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Date: 04 Jan 2003 17:28:58
3 17:28:58 -0800
From: David M. Karr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another bright idea,
make "indexed" work with JSTL forEach and friends
"Craig" == Craig R McClanahan <[EMAIL PR
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Sigh. OK, OK.
>
> But three changes I'd like to see in the code you posted earlier:
>
> 1) Instead of calling Class.forName(), you should use
> RequestUtils.applicationClass(), to make sure the context
> class loader is tried first.
I'll do
> "Craig" == Craig R McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Craig> On 4 Jan 2003, David M. Karr wrote:
>> Can anyone envision any other situations in the Struts code where indirect
>> references to the JSTL would be convenient? That, at least, could give us some
>> additional
the base Struts release.
James
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:37 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: Another bright idea, make "indexed" work with
> JSTL forEach and friends
>
> "James" == James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
James> On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Martin Cooper wrote:
>> If you want to do this, I'd rather see it happen in the html-el taglib
>> than the regular html taglib. Struts-EL already depends on
>> JSTL, and is
>> designed to work
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Martin Cooper wrote:
> If you want to do this, I'd rather see it happen in the html-el taglib
> than the regular html taglib. Struts-EL already depends on
> JSTL, and is
> designed to work in cooperation with it, so it's a much more
> natural fit
> than trying to sneak JSTL
opers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Another bright idea,
>> make "indexed" work with JSTL forEach and friends
>>
>> As has been pointed out, about the only remaining reason to use
>> logic:it
As has been pointed out, about the only remaining reason to use
logic:iterate over c:forEach is that you can't use an html:text tag (or
friends) with an "indexed" property set, because it only looks for
logic:iterate on the page stack.
Now, it would be very simple (having peered at the source) to
11 matches
Mail list logo
