Joe Barefoot wrote:
>Yes, but it doesn't use it "..under the covers" in any way, the implications of that
>are quite different. OJB uses torque as a tool, just as another client application
>would. It is in no way dependent on torque for its core functionality.
>
^^ That's what I was getting
the covers" when it uses it to parse configuration
files?
peace,
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 7:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
>
>
Regardless, it uses torque.
>From: "Joe Barefoot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Persistence Framework Compari
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 15:28, David Graham wrote:
This is a layer above all persistence frameworks (JDBC, JDO, EJB, OJB,
etc.)
that your application programs to. If you decide to change persistence
frameworks, most of your code remains unchanged because it doesn't know
which one you're using.
e with OJB at some point in the future, according to
one of the OJB developers 'round here.
peace,
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OT] RE: Pe
| -Original Message-
| From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:39 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [OT]RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
|
| I'm concerned about the piece of your code that returns a Method
object.
| I
| assume th
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 17:44:14 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OT] RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
>
&g
It did come up briefly. The Jakarta OJB project uses Torque under the
covers as well.
Dave
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
>Date: Fri, 4 Oct
> I'm concerned about the piece of your code that returns a Method object.
I
> assume this is the Method class from the reflection package. It doesn't
> strike me as a very good use of reflection and poor OO technique. Of
> course, your code snippet doesn't show what you ultimately do with t
Craig,
It's good to see some MySQL bashing from a Sun guy :-). I'm guessing you
don't express that view too often working for the company that proclaimed
"Unbreakable MySQL is the future". No views, triggers, stored procedures,
disdain for people who want views...what a joke.
Dave
>From: "
I'm concerned about the piece of your code that returns a Method object. I
assume this is the Method class from the reflection package. It doesn't
strike me as a very good use of reflection and poor OO technique. Of
course, your code snippet doesn't show what you ultimately do with the
Meth
ED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: [OT] RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
>Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:10:23 -0500
>
>
>
> > -Original
> -Original Message-
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OT] RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
>
>
> I think you missed the point. Yes, JDO lets you program to
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, David Graham wrote:
> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 15:28:34 -0600
> From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OT] RE: Persistence Framework Comparison?
>
I think you missed the point. Yes, JDO lets you program to an interface
with multiple vendors competing on implementations. But what if you don't
want to use JDO?
This is a layer above all persistence frameworks (JDBC, JDO, EJB, OJB, etc.)
that your application programs to. If you decide to
15 matches
Mail list logo
