Re: Problem switching to Struts 1.1 from 1.1b3

2003-08-16 Thread Marco Tedone
I am assuming you have : 1) Recompiled all jars that depend on struts with the jars that came with struts 1.1 final. 2) You have updated all *.tld and *.xml files with their new struts versions. 3) Made sure that when you deploy that its deployed with all the new jars. 4) To make sure your

multiple validation files configuration in 1.1b3

2003-03-19 Thread Navjot Singh
hi all, Does Struts1.1b3 correctly configure validation files for multiple modules? I have a serious doubt. I am sure till Struts1.1b2 it was not working and it is documented on Apache site. thanks in advance for any words . Navjot Singh

[OT] sslext (1.1b3) has a bug with modules

2003-03-14 Thread Dennis Muhlestein
sslext does not function as expected with modules. Specifically, when operating withing a module (ie: subappfoo), the sslext:link page=/somepage.do does not find the ModuleConfig for the subapplication. Instead, it finds the ModuleConfig for the root module. The reason the example

RE: [OT] sslext (1.1b3) has a bug with modules

2003-03-14 Thread Ditlinger, Steve
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OT] sslext (1.1b3) has a bug with modules sslext does not function as expected with modules. Specifically, when operating withing a module (ie: subappfoo), the sslext:link page=/somepage.do

RE: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file

2003-02-25 Thread Mark Williamson
: Re: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file Hi, where is this log4j properties file in struts?? i thought only i have to give the message level in web.xml file?? Ashish --- Ashish Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using struts1.1b3 and in my web.xml i have set

struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file

2003-02-24 Thread Ashish Kulkarni
Hi, I am using struts1.1b3 and in my web.xml i have set the debug message level to 4, but still i get a lot of messages in my out file, most of the messages i get are from PropertyMessageResources.java, I also use Log4j for my project and the message level for it is set to 1, does it affect

RE: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file

2003-02-24 Thread Pani, Gourav
: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file Hi, I am using struts1.1b3 and in my web.xml i have set the debug message level to 4, but still i get a lot of messages in my out file, most of the messages i get are from PropertyMessageResources.java, I also use Log4j for my project and the message

Re: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file

2003-02-24 Thread Ashish Kulkarni
Hi, where is this log4j properties file in struts?? i thought only i have to give the message level in web.xml file?? Ashish --- Ashish Kulkarni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using struts1.1b3 and in my web.xml i have set the debug message level to 4, but still i get a lot of messages in

RE: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file

2003-02-24 Thread Pani, Gourav
well, i have log4j setup to do all my logging. so i just set it in my own properties file. -Original Message- From: Ashish Kulkarni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:23 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out

RE: struts 1.1b3 , getting lot of messages in out file

2003-02-24 Thread Karr, David
This has been talked about somewhat recently, but the first issue is that Struts no longer uses those config parameters in the web.xml file to configure debug output. It uses commons-logging, and under that, whichever logging system that is either available or configured. -Original

Re: struts 1.1b3 weblogic 6.1sp2

2003-02-14 Thread Melissa L Kelley
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Pascal Sourisseau wrote: There is a bug in WLS 6.1 sp2 in how it read multiple class-path entries in the manifest file. This issue has been resolved in WLS 6.1 sp4, and Struts 1.1b3 will deploy quite nicely. We are just now in the process of upgrading to sp4 ourselves, so I

RE: struts 1.1b3 weblogic 6.1sp2

2003-02-13 Thread Hohlen, John
My team is using 1.1 B3 WL 6.1 SP 2 without any problems. -Original Message- From: Pascal Sourisseau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:27 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: struts 1.1b3 weblogic 6.1sp2 Importance: High Hi, I've used struts 1.1b3

struts 1.1b3 weblogic 6.1sp2

2003-02-12 Thread Pascal Sourisseau
Hi, I've used struts 1.1b3 application want to deploy to weblogic... Some errors, exceptions occured... for struts-blank application also When i deploy struts-blank 1.02 application on weblogic it seems OK (deployement, execution)... Issues on weblogic 6.1sp2 usage ? Any suggestions

RE: 1.1b3 resource config doesn't work properly with 1.0 config

2003-02-12 Thread Joe Barefoot
) { super(factory, config, returnNull); } -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 1.1b3 resource config doesn't work properly with 1.0 config Struts uses

legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3?

2003-02-12 Thread Joe Barefoot
Hi all, So I see that the call to setRedirect() in the new ActionForward class will cause an exception if called at runtime (after the configuration is frozen). I wasn't expecting this, as I previously thought that only the ActionMapping(s) config was frozen. We can obviously work around

Re: legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3?

2003-02-12 Thread David Graham
You can create and return new ActionForwards and return them from Actions. David From: Joe Barefoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts user (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3? Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14

RE: legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3?

2003-02-12 Thread Joe Barefoot
thanks David, this makes the lack of setRedirect() easy to fix -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: legal to create new ActionForward in 1.1b3? You can create and return new

1.1b3 resource config doesn't work properly with 1.0 config

2003-02-11 Thread Joe Barefoot
Dunno if anyone already ran into this, but at least one element in 1.1b3 is not compatible with the 1.0 configuration files, as it is professed to be on the web site and everywhere else I've looked. Specifically, the web.xml specification of the MessageResourcesFactory class to use does

Re: 1.1b3 resource config doesn't work properly with 1.0 config

2003-02-11 Thread David Graham
PROTECTED] To: Struts user (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1.1b3 resource config doesn't work properly with 1.0 config Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:25:42 -0800 Dunno if anyone already ran into this, but at least one element in 1.1b3 is not compatible with the 1.0 configuration files

[Nested Tags] Problem in 1.1b3 ?

2003-02-10 Thread Jeff_Mychasiw
I have read a couple of posts regarding a situation where the nested tags are calling properties on the wrong bean. We are using a nightly build just after 1.1b2 and all seem to work fine. Once we try b3 then we get the odd problem. I have been using nested tags for all my pages without much

Re: [Nested Tags] Problem in 1.1b3 ?

2003-02-10 Thread Jeff_Mychasiw
We just tried a recent build (feb 8/03) and the problem is the same... :-( Any insight? frustrating note We are using jboss bundled with tomcat 4.0.6. We see the speed increase with newer tomcat and would like to go higher (4.1x) We understand that to move to newer JBoss/Tomcat 4.1x we

RE: nested:multibox broken? in 1.1b3?

2003-02-09 Thread Sri Sankaran
] Subject: nested:multibox broken? in 1.1b3? Hi, I'm trying to use nested:multibox, but I can't seem to get Values printed out. I'd like to be able to write td nested:multibox property=dayStrings value=MondayMon/nested:multibox /td td nested:multibox property=dayStrings

nested:multibox broken? in 1.1b3?

2003-02-08 Thread Sundar Narasimhan
Hi, I'm trying to use nested:multibox, but I can't seem to get Values printed out. I'd like to be able to write td nested:multibox property=dayStrings value=MondayMon/nested:multibox /td td nested:multibox property=dayStrings value=TuesdayTue/nested:multibox /td ... etc. I see that

Re: nested:multibox broken? in 1.1b3?

2003-02-08 Thread Jeff_Mychasiw
I got this from Ted's book: The value attribute is the body of the tag. The label falls outside the tag. Assuming that the user will see Monday and the code will be Mon then tdnested:multibox property =dayStringsMon/nested:multiboxMonday/td tdnested:multibox property

New release of sslext available (1.1b3)

2003-01-27 Thread Ditlinger, Steve
tested with the 4.1.18 version of Tomcat. (Enforcement getting stricter, I like that!) The 1.1b3 version includes a new feature that was recently requested: the ability to disable the HTTP/HTTPS switching. This is something you may want to do temporarily if your SSL is non-functional for whatever

Re: New release of sslext available (1.1b3)

2003-01-27 Thread alexj
Message - From: Ditlinger, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts User List (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:34 AM Subject: New release of sslext available (1.1b3) I have posted a new version of sslext (the Struts extension for HTTP/HTTPS protocol switching) for Struts

Archive searching [was: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3]

2003-01-25 Thread Eric Rizzo
James Mitchell wrote: Try this one (click the first link): http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=struts-user_jakarta_ apache_orgrestrict=exclude=words=commons+libraries Hah, the key is always in picking the right search terms. I was trying various combos of beanutils commons and

Re: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-25 Thread Eric Rizzo
Craig R. McClanahan wrote: If you want the ***exact*** commons sources that were included in Struts 1.1b3, there is a way to get those too ... but it requires that you use anonymous CVS access to the source repositories, as outlined at: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/cvsindex.html If you

[Nested] Issues in 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread Sri Sankaran
Using Struts 1.1b3 I am porting my application from Struts 1.0 to 1.1. One of the pages does not load and reports the error No getter method for property prodsNotInstalled[0].software_code of bean sitebean' The error goes away if nested_jars_10.jar happens to be in WEB-INF/lib. Have you

Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread Eric Rizzo
I got the source distribution for Struts 1.1b3, but it does not include the sources for the commons stuff that was used. My binary dist of Struts 1.1b3 has commons-beanutils.jar with a manifest indicating 1.6-dev as the version - not very helpful since all the pre-release builds of beanutils

RE: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread James Mitchell
does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain (1835-1910) -Original Message- From: Eric Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 7:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3 I

Re: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread Eric Rizzo
James Mitchell wrote: Did you search the archives? I will not give you the answer to thisin factthis question has been asked so much lately that it is beginning to piss off Papa-Strut himself (and that's rare). Trust me, I'd love to search the mailing list archives. But when I go to

Re: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread Eric Rizzo
)? Looking to learn to fish, Eric I remembered mail-achive.com and subsequently found only this response from C.McC. a few days ago: It's inside the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file for each JAR file. What you'll find, though, is that 1.1b3 used a snapshot of all the commons JARs on the day

RE: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread James Mitchell
no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain (1835-1910) -Original Message- From: Eric Rizzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:56 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3 Eric Rizzo wrote: James

Re: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Eric Rizzo wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:20:44 -0500 From: Eric Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3 I got the source distribution for Struts 1.1b3, but it does

RE: Commons source for Struts 1.1b3

2003-01-24 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, James Mitchell wrote: Try this one (click the first link): http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/htsearch?config=struts-user_jakarta_ apache_orgrestrict=exclude=words=commons+libraries If you want the ***exact*** commons sources that were included in Struts 1.1b3

struts 1.1b3 - commons jars, which version ?

2003-01-21 Thread Arik Levin ( Tikal )
At struts 1.1b3 lib there are commons jars files, how should I know the version of each one of them?

Re: struts 1.1b3 - commons jars, which version ?

2003-01-21 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Arik Levin ( Tikal ) wrote: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:48:32 +0200 From: Arik Levin ( Tikal ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: struts 1.1b3 - commons jars, which version

Struts-blank (1.1b3) error Missing message for key welcome.title

2003-01-20 Thread Brown, Melonie S. - Contractor
I downloaded struts 1.1b3 and expanded the struts-blank.war file in Tomcat. I fired up Tomcat and verified that I could see the welcome page for the blank app. I then copied the struts blank folder into a new project in Eclipse, added the jar files to the project properties, rebuilt the project

Re: Struts-blank (1.1b3) error Missing message for key welcome.title

2003-01-20 Thread julian green
Eclipse zaps everything in your classes folder when you rebiuld the project. If you have your properties file in the classes folder it gets zapped. Is that what is happening? Julian Brown, Melonie S. - Contractor wrote: I downloaded struts 1.1b3 and expanded the struts-blank.war file

Struts 1.1b3, Validator Javascript and CDATA

2003-01-20 Thread Raible, Matt
Is it possible in 1.1b3 to turn off the CDATA rendering in the following javascript block? script type=text/javascript ![CDATA[ !-- Begin var bCancel = false; function validateHSCRFMasterForm(form) { if (bCancel) return true; else return

Re: Struts 1.1b3, Validator Javascript and CDATA

2003-01-20 Thread David Graham
I know it causes an error and that's why I added the cdata attribute to the javascript tag post 1.1b3. You'll have to use a very recent nightly to get that change though. The cdata attribute is true by default so you have to set it to false. Dave From: Raible, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED

upgrade from 1.1b2 to 1.1b3

2003-01-07 Thread Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC
I tried the upgrade (replacing jar and tld files) and got the following error when running my app. Here's hoping someone has a quick answer off the top of their head - before I start guessing at solutions (and yes, commons-logging.jar is in WEB-INF/lib). 500 Internal Server Error

RE: upgrade from 1.1b2 to 1.1b3

2003-01-07 Thread Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC
Nevermind, I've solved the problem. -Original Message- From: Jarnot Voytek Contr AU HQ/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 7:33 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: upgrade from 1.1b2 to 1.1b3 I tried the upgrade (replacing jar and tld files) and got

1.1b3?

2002-12-03 Thread Andy Kriger
I noticed that the nightly docs are labelled 1.1-b3-dev (maybe this is nothing new and I'm just unobservant). Is there a b3 milestone build coming soon? Is there a changes file that docs functional changes btw milestones? (as opposed to the diffs btw nightly builds) thx andy -- To unsubscribe,

Re: 1.1b3?

2002-12-03 Thread David Graham
Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1.1b3? Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:39:12 -0500 I noticed that the nightly docs are labelled 1.1-b3-dev (maybe this is nothing new and I'm just unobservant). Is there a b3 milestone build coming soon? Is there a changes file that docs functional changes btw