RE: Options tag question

2001-11-22 Thread Peter Pilgrim
PROTECTED] on 21/11/2001 11:51 ZE8 Please respond to Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: Options tag question Peter, When I used the bean:define tag together with html:options. I had first define a bean

RE: Options tag question

2001-11-21 Thread Tricia Ong Cheah Yen
Message- From: Peter Pilgrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:49 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Options tag question Unfortunately the current html:options requires that you use bean:define indirectly to use the tag. define:bean id=brokerLabelValues

RE: Options tag question

2001-11-21 Thread Brian Holzer
- From: Peter Pilgrim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:49 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Options tag question Unfortunately the current html:options requires that you use bean:define indirectly to use the tag. define:bean id=brokerLabelValues name

Options tag question

2001-11-20 Thread ltorrence
In reworking my Action classes, I tried to package all values needed for my form in the form bean, so I included a property that contains an ArrayList of LabelValueBeans. Can I refer to this property to populate the html:options tag? This nested syntax doesn't seem to work: html:options

Re: Options tag question

2001-11-20 Thread Peter Pilgrim
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 20/11/2001 09:44 EST Please respond to Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Options tag question In reworking my Action classes, I tried to package all values needed for my form in the form