On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:07:10 -0800, Nadeem Bitar wrote:
Which role will struts play when JSF matures, and JSF 2.0 is
released is what interests me more than the proposed name of struts
2.0.
Struts will be whatever the community needs it to be.
The Struts-JSF taglib Craig put together
I guess what I was trying to say that JSF currently complement struts
and the overlap is very small but I think future version of JSF would
improve upon JSF current navigation model and would have an improved
controller, validation ... and the two frameworks would be very similar
and it would be
Personally I think if struts 2.0 would be able to leverage JSF and JSTL
and add IoC, cleaner interfaces, workflow, chained actions and JMX
configured ActionMapping it would make it my ideal framework and would
probably make it the best framework for medium to large scale projects.
Sounds great!
hi nadeem
Personally I think if struts 2.0 would be able to leverage JSF and JSTL
and add IoC, cleaner interfaces, workflow, chained
actions and JMX configured ActionMapping it would make it my ideal
framework and would probably make it the best framework for medium to
large scale projects.
: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Samstag, 13. März 2004 09:09
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: [OT] Jericho == Struts 2.0?
+1
Damn fool name.
I much prefer the sound of Struts 2 myself...
Struts2EE perhaps ?? ;-
-Original Message-
From: Larry Meadors [mailto:[EMAIL
At 11:33 AM +0100 3/15/04, Jesse Alexander (KAID 11) wrote:
+ 1
Struts 2 or Struts v2 say what it is: a new major version of struts.
Struts2 or Struts2EE imply: It is not Struts. It may be based on
Struts, or is something similar.
Jericho, or whatever other name choosen, just say nothing at
:)
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Marz 2004 15:21
An: Struts Users Mailing List
Betreff: RE: [OT] Jericho == Struts 2.0?
At 11:33 AM +0100 3/15/04, Jesse Alexander (KAID 11) wrote:
+ 1
Struts 2 or Struts v2 say what it is: a new major version
so
not
kidding)
2. Chevrolet tried selling Chevy Nova's in Mexico
Like you said, its just words...
Andreas :)
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 15. Marz 2004 15:21
An: Struts Users Mailing List
Betreff: RE: [OT] Jericho == Struts 2.0
?
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Goodin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [OT] Jericho == Struts 2.0?
I'm thinking Titanic, Soddom, Gommorah, Hindenburg are equally excellent
names.
:D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/15/2004 8:15:06 AM
Doing a google search for struts jericho might be a good start.
:)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/15/04 8:40 AM
On a more on-topic note, where can I get info on the new features /
differences in Struts 1.1 and 2.0?
-
To unsubscribe,
The Apache convention is to give proposals a codename. Once a working implementation
is available, then, and only then, do we start making decisions that might ultimately
lead to assigning version numbers.
Absolutely no one is saying that this proposal is going to be Struts 2.0. It's just a
http://raibledesigns.com on this it is available find out.But not difference
just download test build1.2 and make difference note and post it.
-Jignesh
On Monday 15 March 2004 21:14, Larry Meadors wrote:
Doing a google search for struts jericho might be a good start.
:)
:
[EMAIL
no hablar engles?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/15/2004 9:15:54 AM
http://raibledesigns.com on this it is available find out.But not
difference
just download test build1.2 and make difference note and post it.
-Jignesh
On Monday 15 March 2004 21:14, Larry Meadors wrote:
Doing a google search for
Which role will struts play when JSF matures, and JSF 2.0 is released is
what interests me more than the proposed name of struts 2.0.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 09:26 -0700, Brandon Goodin wrote:
no hablar engles?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/15/2004 9:15:54 AM
http://raibledesigns.com on this it
14 matches
Mail list logo
