Cakalic, James wrote:
I can't comment on the nested exceptions of 1.4 as I haven't really looked
at this. But I would venture that my above comments apply there equally.
Nested exceptions are really a very good thing, and not hard to do
pre-1.4
Unfortunately no because I think it contains some really nice features for
Struts. This is a commerical product that I'm working on. However, I have
received permission to discuss the exception framework in the Struts book
that I'm working on for OReilly right now. Search the mailing list
Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: RES: handling exceptions
Unfortunately no because I think it contains some really nice features for
Struts. This is a commerical product that I'm working on. However, I have
received permission to discuss the exception framework in the Struts
That's a good idea. The only issue that I can think of is that you'll be dependent on
1.4, since the logging API isn't available to previous SDKs. Something like log4j is
available to 1.1 and above. There's no reason that I can think of why anyone wouldn't
use the latest version of the SDK,
Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: RES: handling exceptions
Hi,
JDK1.4 is at final release candidate stage. They include nested exceptions
(including all remote exceptions) and a logging framework.
Use these, and not any other version (eg log4j), you will be future proofing
your CV and code
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: RES: handling exceptions
Hi,
JDK1.4 is at final release candidate stage. They include nested exceptions
(including all remote exceptions) and a logging framework.
Use these, and not any other version (eg log4j), you will be future proofing
your CV and code
Message-
From: Jonathan Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:30 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: RES: handling exceptions
Hi,
JDK1.4 is at final release candidate stage. They include
nested exceptions (including all remote exceptions
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: RES: handling exceptions
Hmm. Just because it appears in the JDK doesn't mean that it is a good
thing. The original JSR47 has changed substantially from its original
specification due, in no small part
Cakalic, James wrote:
Hmm. Just because it appears in the JDK doesn't mean that it is a good
thing.
snip
As a user of Struts, imagine
for a moment that JDK 1.5 included an MVC implementation similar to Struts
but with reduced functionality and limited extension capability. Would you
At 11:04 AM 1/28/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Aside from functional differences, it is not practical or advisable for
everyone to adopt JDK 1.4 as soon as it hits release. For one thing, Sun
only releases the JDK for Windows and Solaris platforms. What if you are
using Linux? Or AIX? Or HP-UX? Or
that
such releases will occur concurrently with Sun's JDK releases -- given the
historical track record.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Yu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 2:40 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: RES: handling exceptions
At 11:04 AM 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
