Re[2]: java.util.Date

2002-11-06 Thread Rick Reumann
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 3:21:28 PM, Antoni wrote: AR Keep in mind that DateFormat (and SimpleDateFormat) is not thread safe so you AR have to be very careful when reusing them. I like Max's suggestion though. I think I will move it to the setFormatPattern for sure. Correct

Re[2]: java.util.Date

2002-11-06 Thread Rick Reumann
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 4:47:32 PM, Eddie wrote: EB static blocks are run with the class - right? So it's really EB irrelevant how many instances get created - that code is run a EB maximum of one time - when the class is first loaded. EB Am I wrong? Right that's what I was

Re: Re[2]: java.util.Date

2002-11-06 Thread Antoni Reus
Hi, I don't speak english very very well, so this is a bit difficult for me to explain, but I'll try ;-) see below ... A Dimecres 06 Novembre 2002 21:37, Rick Reumann va escriure: On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 3:21:28 PM, Antoni wrote: AR Keep in mind that DateFormat (and

Re[2]: java.util.Date

2002-11-06 Thread Rick Reumann
On Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 6:51:22 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: WS Rick, thanks for posting this! I almost missed it, but caught Max's reply. WS You say that the default BeanUtils.copyProperties works fie with WS java.sql.Date, but I find that I still have a problem unless the user types WS in