Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-10 Thread Frederic Barozzi
Well you are all all rigth. I think that's struts is a standar now, like Tomcat, and other Open source projects from Apache. I'm happy to see that in fact there is no real solution. I mean not a magic , but more precisly a standar one. I've never wanted to reinvent the wheel as Eddie said, but

xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Frederic Barozzi
Hi, Is there a better way than an other to work with xml document and jsp ? I trie to explain: - I like this solution: a client send a request to the server. This one, with internal java bean, processes the request. It asks the DB server, the file system, or other to made a DOM

RE: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Andrew Hill
Have you seen Jeff Penal's STXX extension? http://www.oroad.com/opencode/stxx/ -Original Message- From: Frederic Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 18:09 To: Struts Subject: xml, jsp, DOM Hi, Is there a better way than an other to work with xml

Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Frederic Barozzi
Thanks, It looks good, but i really need to limitate externals jar imports and as posible software update and garantee too. So i need method advise in using struts, xml, and jsp. Thanks again, i will try it, but there are too many jar like orion, ... Fred

RE: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Stefan.Landro
Message- From: Frederic Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2002 12:09 To: Struts Subject: xml, jsp, DOM Hi, Is there a better way than an other to work with xml document and jsp ? I trie to explain: - I like this solution: a client send a request to the server

Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Frederic Barozzi
You're rigth. but , in an other hand all my software users want: - a garantee of standar. - a complete source code. - and all reasons that explain lib uses and architecture choices. For example, it was difficult to explain the Struts framwork choice. Why don't you use standar java classes, they

Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Eddie Bush
Frederic Barozzi wrote: You're rigth. but , in an other hand all my software users want: - a garantee of standar. - a complete source code. - and all reasons that explain lib uses and architecture choices. For example, it was difficult to explain the Struts framwork choice. Why don't you use

Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Brian Hickey
PROTECTED] To: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:47 AM Subject: Re: xml, jsp, DOM You're rigth. but , in an other hand all my software users want: - a garantee of standar. - a complete source code. - and all reasons that explain lib uses

Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread Eddie Bush
Yes - but it's Stxx he's talking about. I think he already cleared Struts. Brian Hickey wrote: Frederic, I can give you the business case for Struts. Read on if you dare... -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: xml, jsp, DOM

2002-10-09 Thread V. Cekvenich
Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 11:47 AM Subject: Re: xml, jsp, DOM You're rigth. but , in an other hand all my software users want: - a garantee of standar. - a complete source code. - and all reasons that explain lib uses and architecture choices