I think this happened because of the patch that transformed mainwindow to
have an ::instance() method, but didn`t fully fixed the rest of the code.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em ter 18 fev 2014, às 16:30:01, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> > > Can someone verify whether t
Signed-off-by: Thiago Macieira
---
qt-ui/mainwindow.cpp | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/qt-ui/mainwindow.cpp b/qt-ui/mainwindow.cpp
index 42b07fb..7609bff 100644
--- a/qt-ui/mainwindow.cpp
+++ b/qt-ui/mainwindow.cpp
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ MainWindow::MainWindow() : QMainWindow(),
Em ter 18 fev 2014, às 16:30:01, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> > Can someone verify whether the pointer was null? It looks unlikely though.
>
> Definitely not null. And adding qDebug() to the lastUsedImageDir()
> function I was able to see that it got called. But something in that
> process destroyed t
On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 16:25 -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em ter 18 fev 2014, às 16:16:10, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> > On Feb 18, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> > > dirk, can you test the patch? I couldn`t really understand why it crashed
> > > if not static, since we should always ha
Em ter 18 fev 2014, às 16:16:10, Dirk Hohndel escreveu:
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> > dirk, can you test the patch? I couldn`t really understand why it crashed
> > if not static, since we should always have that object. saing that - the
> > correct way to handle that sh
On Feb 18, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> dirk, can you test the patch? I couldn`t really understand why it crashed if
> not static, since we should always have that object.
> saing that - the correct way to handle that should be from the Settings, no?
The patch does indeed fix thi
dirk, can you test the patch? I couldn`t really understand why it crashed
if not static, since we should always have that object.
saing that - the correct way to handle that should be from the Settings, no?
QSettings s;
s.value("lastUsedImageDirectory").toString() or something
On Tue, Feb 18, 20
On 17 Feb 2014, at 23:57, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> This does not include the promised whitespace overhaul.
> Instead I added a few outstanding patches and went down the rabbit hole
> of trying to track down a crash with Robert's image shift patches.
>
> Here's how I can reliably reproduce this.
hi!
i've upgraded from subsurface 3.0.2 to 4.0.3 on my macbook.
i tried to open my existing logbook, but failed. the old logbook is
stored in ~/Library/Application Support/Subsurface/mike.xml (default
from 3.x), but ~/Library does not show up in the "open logbook" dialogue.
~/Library does show up
This update to the manual is mostly style and grammar.
The section about download from dive computers has been expanded to
include all controls in the download panel
and to make absolutely sure that the libdivecomputer log and dump are
not accidentally activated.
Kind regards,
willemf
>From c1
10 matches
Mail list logo