Re: Website translations [was Re: 4.8.1 has been released]

2018-07-16 Thread Davide DB
Hi Dirk, Moving website text to Transifex is the best and wise option. I love the speed and user-friendliness of their tool. I hope to contribute there soon for Italian language. ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

RE: Website translations [was Re: 4.8.1 has been released]

2018-07-14 Thread Peter Zaal
Just 4 notifications ;) I am happy that you are willing to look into this, I really think it would benefit to have more and up to date translations. At the same time I understand that once a system is in place and working, you just let it be. And it's probably not an easy refactoring, so I don't

Re: Website translations [was Re: 4.8.1 has been released]

2018-07-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On July 14, 2018 12:05:39 PM PDT, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >I'm happy to look into wiring things up so that we can use Transifex >for the translations. Let me look at what tools are available and how >much manual work this will mean for me - because in the end, that's the >part that I am most

Re: Website translations [was Re: 4.8.1 has been released]

2018-07-14 Thread Peter Zaal
Hi. I have not actually looked at the website pages in GitHub, but out of curiosity, did you ever think about, or considered using Transifex for the translations of the website pages? Or would this now be too late or just not fit that? I have been contributing to the (Dutch) translations just

Re: Website translations [was Re: 4.8.1 has been released]

2018-07-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
One more thing. I think a reasonable goal for any language would be that the static pages are in sync and that the LATEST News posts are translated. I don't think there's any point in today going back and translating the old announcements. If you decide to start today, I'd suggest starting with

Website translations [was Re: 4.8.1 has been released]

2018-07-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Jul 14, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Murillo Bernardes wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:53 AM Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> Speaking of which, we should reconsider some of the translations that we >> offer. >> >> Dutch and Spanish are clearly actively maintained. German is somewhat >>