Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[tormento]

Yep it works!

Thanks to everybody!

Il giorno mer 11 set 2019 alle ore 20:42 Robert Helling 
ha scritto:

> Hi,
>
> On 11. Sep 2019, at 16:51, tormento  wrote:
>
> Any update on status? When I can test on continuous build?
>
>
> Dirk merged this today (after releasing 4.9.3). It should show up in the
> latest builds on
> https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/releases/tag/continuous
>
> Best
> Robert
>
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[Robert Helling]

Hi,

> On 11. Sep 2019, at 16:51, tormento  wrote:
> 
> Any update on status? When I can test on continuous build?
> 

Dirk merged this today (after releasing 4.9.3). It should show up in the latest 
builds on 
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/releases/tag/continuous 


Best
Robert


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[tormento]

Any update on status? When I can test on continuous build?

Thanks 🤗

Il giorno dom 8 set 2019 alle 19:12 Robert Helling  ha
scritto:

>
>
> On 7. Sep 2019, at 11:49, tormento  wrote:
>
> Unchecking "Display transitions in deco" shows 21m gate too.
>
>
> I think I have a PR that fixes this issue:
> https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/pull/2282
>
> But the logic in the planner notes when to print what information is quite
> subtle, so this can never get enough testing.
>
> Best
> Robert
>
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[Robert Helling]

> On 7. Sep 2019, at 11:49, tormento  wrote:
> 
> Unchecking "Display transitions in deco" shows 21m gate too.

I think I have a PR that fixes this issue: 
https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/pull/2282 


But the logic in the planner notes when to print what information is quite 
subtle, so this can never get enough testing.

Best
Robert


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[tormento]

Unchecking "Display transitions in deco" shows 21m gate too.

Il giorno ven 6 set 2019 alle ore 23:29 Rick Walsh 
ha scritto:

> Hi Tormento,
>
> I suggest unchecking the 'display transitions in deco' option. It will
> then only show the actual stops.
>
> Rick
>
> P.S. yes I'm still around
>
> On Fri, 6 Sep. 2019, 19:21 tormento,  wrote:
>
>> I have started to use EAN50 to cut deco and I am planning some diving.
>>
>> In available gas I put bot twin bottle air and the EAN50 bottle.
>>
>> Let's do, as example, 32 minutes @ 37 meters. GF 45/95.
>>
>> Even if I check "Only switch at required stops", the dive plan details
>> show me the 21m (MOD of EAN50) gate obviously with the ascend time only, as
>> no deco is planned at that depth.
>>
>> depth duration runtime gas
>> ➘ 37m 2min 2min air
>> ➙ 37m 30min 32min
>> *➚ 21m 2min 34min *
>> ➚ 15m 1min 34min
>> - 15m 1min 35min EAN50
>> ➚ 12m  0min 35min
>> - 12m 2min 37min
>> ➚ 9m 0min 37min
>> - 9m 3min 40min
>> ➚ 6m 0min 40min
>> - 6m 15min 55min
>> ➚ 0m 1min 56min
>>
>> It would be nice that no more info than necessary would be shown or
>> calculated.
>>
>> Can you please fix that when ""Only switch at required stops" is set?
>> ___
>> subsurface mailing list
>> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
>> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>>
>
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[Robert Helling]

Hi Rick,

> On 6. Sep 2019, at 23:29, Rick Walsh  wrote:
> 
> I suggest unchecking the 'display transitions in deco' option. It will then 
> only show the actual stops.

yes, this makes it better, but still, there should be no entry at 21m. The 
problem seems to be a non-gasswitch leg of duration 0 at that depth. 
Unfortunately, my debugger is currently disfunctional (and I am still 
travelling), so I am approaching this with printfs… But I am on it.

Best
Robert

PS: Yes,  at least in principle I am also still around...


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface

Re: Unnecessary detail in dive plan

[Rick Walsh]

Hi Tormento,

I suggest unchecking the 'display transitions in deco' option. It will then
only show the actual stops.

Rick

P.S. yes I'm still around

On Fri, 6 Sep. 2019, 19:21 tormento,  wrote:

> I have started to use EAN50 to cut deco and I am planning some diving.
>
> In available gas I put bot twin bottle air and the EAN50 bottle.
>
> Let's do, as example, 32 minutes @ 37 meters. GF 45/95.
>
> Even if I check "Only switch at required stops", the dive plan details
> show me the 21m (MOD of EAN50) gate obviously with the ascend time only, as
> no deco is planned at that depth.
>
> depth duration runtime gas
> ➘ 37m 2min 2min air
> ➙ 37m 30min 32min
> *➚ 21m 2min 34min *
> ➚ 15m 1min 34min
> - 15m 1min 35min EAN50
> ➚ 12m  0min 35min
> - 12m 2min 37min
> ➚ 9m 0min 37min
> - 9m 3min 40min
> ➚ 6m 0min 40min
> - 6m 15min 55min
> ➚ 0m 1min 56min
>
> It would be nice that no more info than necessary would be shown or
> calculated.
>
> Can you please fix that when ""Only switch at required stops" is set?
> ___
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface