Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Eben/Tomeu, On 18 May 2008, at 15:37, Eben Eliason wrote: Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben I'm trying to apply you patch directly to an Xo with joyride 1946 (I don't have access to any other build

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the spam. This includes the necessary change to the makefile, and also fixes a few small bugs in the former versions. I'm still testing the rpm, but at a first glance, the pulsing is taking too much CPU. Looks

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the spam. This includes the necessary change to the

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On joyride, the shell just takes a few percents of cpu during launch, so perhaps it's good enough for now. Correction, takes 7%, enough to give it a look. Tomeu ___ Sugar

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do we get the patch into the rpm without actually pushing the

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Eben Eliason
Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Eben Eliason
Sorry for the spam. This includes the necessary change to the makefile, and also fixes a few small bugs in the former versions. - Eben On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Tomeu

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-18 Thread Gary C Martin
Hi Eben/Tomeu, On 18 May 2008, at 15:37, Eben Eliason wrote: Attached,with launchbox.py included. - Eben I'm trying to apply you patch directly to an Xo with joyride 1946 (I don't have access to any other build environment so my tests are limited to patching an Xo B4). The patch seems

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-15 Thread Eben Eliason
I'm resubmitting this patch, as a lot has changed on master since it was last posted. I'd /really/ like to have a working version of this in joyride for testing by next Monday, since it will give us the opportunity to get feedback directly from educators from the deployment countries. - Eben

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-15 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm resubmitting this patch, as a lot has changed on master since it was last posted. I'd /really/ like to have a working version of this in joyride for testing by next Monday, since it will give us the opportunity to get

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-15 Thread Eben Eliason
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, responding privately for more details on your suggestion. Are you suggesting that I copy the patch onto a laptop direclty (say, via USB)

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-15 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ummm, maybe. Do you mean build an rpm from the tarball? Yeah the sources tarball. Otherwise, how do we get the patch into the rpm without actually pushing the changes to git master? In any case, I know little about how

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-05-15 Thread Eben Eliason
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do we get the patch into the rpm without actually pushing the changes to git master? In any case, I know little about how any of these

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-04-18 Thread Eben Eliason
Here's my second pass at the launcher patch. This version changes little in the actual behavior of the code, but substantially cleans up the code itself. I pulled all of the pending_activity code out, simplifying the model a good deal, as we no longer need it with the new Home design. I also

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-04-18 Thread Eben Eliason
A small update this time. I rewrote the launchbox.py file. This version uses a simple CanvasBox, eliminating the need for a complex layout class for what amounts to a centered icon. I also eliminated some old code that was leftover from my early tests. Finally, I implemented the suspend/resume

[sugar] [PATCH] (Incomplete) Activity Launch Feedback

2008-04-16 Thread Eben Eliason
This patch is mainly for Marco, who plans to help me finish and clean up the new activity launcher. It's currently full of TODOs, comments, temporary hacks, etc, but it's in a nearly complete state inasmuch as it will run smoothly despite the partially unfinished and poorly styled implementation.