Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 14:33 -0400, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos a
écrit :
Guillaume Desmottes wrote:
Search queries will return a {Buddy,Activity}View object. This object
will have a Get{Buddies,Activities} method to retrieve the result of the
search, a Changed (or Added/Removed) signal to
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:53:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, two more open bugs that should be considered by someone:
(1) Record has been
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I was probably wrong to bring up the Record bug in this thread.
However, the Browse bugs seem to be related to unsupported features in
the browser--e.g., the need for some daughter windows to appear.
Feature or bug--not
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I was probably wrong to bring up the Record bug in this thread.
However, the Browse bugs seem to be related to unsupported features in
the
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Simon Schampijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
thanks very much for your detailed review - it was very useful! I am fine
with most of your comments and changed the code accordingly. I made inline
comments for the items.
So I would re-base my changes on
Hi,
after a few weeks of absence of the sugar meeting we want to get back into
track
again. Next meeting will be Thursday June 05 2008 at 17.00 UTC.
Please note the new place: irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting.
We want to make a meeting about the sugar review process. To make it even more
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:44:09AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Looks good to me. Small comments inline:
+import logging
+logger = logging.getLogger('DevicesTray')
What about moving the import along with the others and declaring the
logger at the module level as in
Le mercredi 04 juin 2008 à 17:08 +0200, Morgan Collett a écrit :
The main code to review is at:
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/morgan/sugar;a=shortlog;h=6298 (3
most recent patches).
As bundle_id is passed to both constructor, you could move it to
BaseInvite.__init__
Didn't read code
Hello!
Here are the modules which are included in the release:
Glucose: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Roadmap#Glucose_Modules
Fructose: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Roadmap#Fructose_Modules
Please provide source code tarballs and announce them as explained here:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Martin Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an aside...
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:16:27PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Sayamindu, you say you got OOM problems after activating composition,
can you check where that memory is going? Or might be the X server
Oooops thanks!
Marco
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04.06.2008, at 17:52, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello!
Here are the modules which are included in the release:
Glucose: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Roadmap#Glucose_Modules
Fructose:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 10:28:25AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:53:37PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, two more open bugs
def present(self):
-# wnck.Window.activate() expects a timestamp, but we don't
-# always have one, and libwnck will complain if we pass 0,
-# and matchbox doesn't look at the timestamp anyway. So we
-# just always pass 1.
-self._window.activate(1)
+
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
def present(self):
-# wnck.Window.activate() expects a timestamp, but we don't
-# always have one, and libwnck will complain if we pass 0,
-# and matchbox doesn't look at the timestamp
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
def present(self):
-# wnck.Window.activate() expects a timestamp, but we don't
-# always have one, and libwnck will
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
def present(self):
-# wnck.Window.activate()
Hello All,
I'm currently working on creating documentation for the api of several basic
sugar packages. I've started putting some of this work online at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar-api-doc. I'm sure that many of you have a
lot of knowledge and experience with different modules in sugar and
Hello,
Some patches that implement nicer tabbing will follow. With the patches
applied, pressing Alt+Tab will show the frame. The activity that will
be selected as soon as Alt is released again is shown by popping up
its palette.
Unfortunately there are a couple of issues with palettes.
One
This commit switches the Frame to be a GObject. By doing this the gobject
property system can be used to notify interested parties when the frame
becomes fully visible. This is needed, so that the ActivitiesTray can
show the palette of an activity as soon as the frame is fully visible.
---
This commits adds some functions and properties to keep track of the
activities when the user is tabbing.
---
src/model/homemodel.py | 61
1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/model/homemodel.py
This adds the neccessary keyboard handling, grabbing the input, switching to
the new activity, or canceling the operation. It is also responsible for
showing the frame during the tabbing operation.
---
src/view/keyhandler.py | 96 +++-
1 files
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:28:40PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
I tried your ps_mem.py based tests [...]
Cool -- looks like just moving to os16 + metacity saved at least 14
MiB[1] (not counting any python savings) and Xorg grew by 15 MiB.
Cheers,
Sayamindu
Martin
1. 2 + 6 + 6 MiB:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:03:44AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
* Browser bookmarks and autocompletion. - priority 3
I'd really like to see some progress on #542/#5534 (deal with
non-standard SSL certificate authorities). This is going to become a
bigger and bigger stumbling block the
23 matches
Mail list logo
