[sugar] Please accept my invitation to join Marbella Hardware invention/ Electronica/ Programming

Marbella Hardware invention/ Electronica/ Programming Join David Laurence and 6 other Members in Marbella. Be the first to hear about upcoming Meetups. The idea is a multifaceted group in which people from the coast can join together and collaborate in a spacious Office to come up

Re: [sugar] Human Interface Guidelines (update and hosting)

to the OLPC wiki or b) perform a complete update in place, teasing XO specific parts into separate pages, and then move it to sugarlabs when we're done or c) come up with a way to work in parallel? Thanks for your assistance! david ___ Sugar mailing list

Re: [sugar] Sugar Design Meeting REMINDER (Now)

, or I failed to set it up. My apologies, I raised my hand during SugarCamp to work on automating meetings, I have not gotten to it yet. Any master scriptwriters intrested in taking on this task. david - Eben ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar

Re: [sugar] Sugar Labs introduction

about this! So as David says there are two schemes, and people in countries can begin to adjust to one or another. I'm very interested in this company partner scheme. Will be monitoring and figuring how to make it work here as well. thanks david On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Yamandu

Re: [sugar] Fwd: Roadmap update

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Riccardo Lucchese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is `zero olpc contractors working full time on Sugar' ? Sorry about the lack of clarity, I somehow assumed everyone knew about this

Re: [sugar] Fwd: Roadmap update

maintains in Fedora? On the other hand, who in their right mind would base their Fortune 100 IT infrastructure on Linux if it were not for the support guarantees the Red Hats of the world provide. Over all, this is a good thing! thanks david ___ Sugar

Re: [sugar] Installing sugar on Debian lenny

I am adding debian-olpc-devel to this thread. They will most likely have the most experience with debian specific issues. david On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Sascha Silbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi

[sugar] Sugar Camp - Hard Problems

, talents, and money to work on theses issues. david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] list of complaints from sugarcamp community building talk

. There seem to be significant cultural differences between people who sit in front of a computer all day and those who spend their days standing between a blackboard and and a classroom full of kids. david On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Caroline Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems like a cool

[sugar] Sugar Camp - Friday Nov 21

in having. The day will be run as a sugar labs mertiocarcy. Those who have contributed the most to sugar labs will have the floor. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

[sugar] Looking for a room. Was Re: [OLPC library] revision to the Manual

Does anyone have room for Adam for the weekend. david On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Adam Floss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone have a spare couch? Adam This is probably sent while in transit On Nov 18, 2008, at 9:45, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like Adam Hyde

[sugar] sugar-devel mailing list

The Sugar developers have started a upstream list for sugar development issues that are not OLPC specific. If you are interested, please feel free to join. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] sugar-devel mailing list

Thanks Ivan david On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Ivan Krstić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:59 PM, David Farning wrote: The Sugar developers have started a upstream list for sugar development issues that are not OLPC specific. If you are interested, please feel free

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] OLPC France CodeCamp in Paris

desarroladores en Paris, por si alguien necesita. Bests, saludos Great work Samy! Your project embodies what I hope is becoming the development for Sugar Labs. Bringing together smart and passionate people to work on interesting and compelling problems. thanks david

[sugar] Sugar on Gnome mobile

enough to run on low powered netbooks. If they include the right subset. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] dinner around cambridge on sunday

food and drinks somewhere not far from Davis Square? My plane is scheduled to arrive at 21.45, so I would go directly to wherever people choose. Regards, Tomeu Sounds good. david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http

Re: [sugar] SugarCamp

to fund its own operations (Walter Bender) - How SugarLabs is going to govern itself (Walter Bender, David Farning?) - How SugarLabs is partnering with other organizations (David Farning) - etc, you get the idea. I think most of those talks could give material for discussion for at least half

Re: [sugar] Tentative talk schedule: Nov 19

recorded, digitized, and posted for anyone not present (or enjoying an overly-leisurely lunch, say). --scott scott It looks like Bernie start a on-line schedule at http://sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Sugarcamp thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar Camp Cambridge 17-21 Nov

put them both down on the wiki, and we could just talk about one after the other. That would be great. There is a bit of work started on that front. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Sugarcamp hackathon (Was: Re: November conference (meeting notes))

Hey Mel, Sounds like a great event. I will be in Boston the weekend before and the weekend after the meeting, so I can help out where ever you need. Thanks david Also, a public thanks to Mel for providing me a place to stay during the event! On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Mel Chua [EMAIL

Re: [sugar] Sugar on Edubuntu

Yoshiki. I'll forward this information to the Ubuntu Squeak maintainer. Do you know who I should talk to about requesting that http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/ be update to reflect this information? thanks david On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

[sugar] Sugar on Edubuntu

Edubuntu held a IRC planning meeting that was well attended by Sugar. As David VA pointed out in an earlier thread, Edubuntu has had a complicated history. (who hasn't) Hopefully, we can use some Sugar/Ubuntu SugarTeam/LTSP/Edubuntu synergy to help reignite interest in Edubuntu. Much

Re: [sugar] Sugar on Edubuntu

On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:18 PM, David Van Assche [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main, and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable, iirc. Its

Re: [sugar] Sugar on Edubuntu

David: Yeah thats the one. Vik: The edubuntu community is seeing how it can move the edubuntu portion into universe, though that then limits support, as only main and restricted get full support from ubuntu developers. It is currently unsure what will go where, but edubuntu in universe means more

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar on Edubuntu

Thanks Edward, I see that you have cced Yoshiki and Robin. If they don't catch this thread, I follow up with them. thanks david On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 6

Re: [sugar] Sugar on Edubuntu

I wasnt aware squeak was a firmware binary or a font... No but seriously, that passage talks about just fonts.. not software that uses wrongly licensed components, which is what squeak is David On 11/6/08, Luke Faraone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 20:18, David Van Assche

Re: [sugar] November conference (meeting notes)

employees. On the other hand, Walter is not in town Tuesday. Walter, David, since you was not in the meeting, how do you feel about it? If possible, 1 sounds like a more logical flow. Hackfest - Meet and find our common goal of developing good software. Talks - Establish a common picture

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] membership guidelines again

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: David, Thanks for writing this up. Comments/questions in line. ---Membership Guidelines--- Any contributor who is active in helping Sugar Labs accomplish its mission is eligible for membership. It would

[sugar] solar powered ltsp for developing world

on 12V -- and to use a lot less power than the stock versions. As Scott says, in solar-powered computer installations, The Watt is king. Theres quite a mention of OLPC there... kind regards, David Van Assche ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http

Re: [sugar] Activities packaging

Perhaps they could be held in a database on schools.sugarlabs.org, this allows for easy searching of the bundles, grouping, and accessing in one location. just a thought, David Van Assche * If possible, don't publish the actual .xo files as uploads to the OLPC (or any other) wiki. It puts

[sugar] November meeting

to propose that the event be informally coordinated by the developers themselves. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Schools.Sugarlabs.org

to set up a course please let me or David Farning know.nbsp; So far our plans are to use it support collaboration by nontechnical groups that maybe more used to a web based forum then a mailing list.nbsp; However, its available for repositories and other uses as well.nbsp; It is being hosted

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Schools.Sugarlabs.org

it must be fit into the particular country's curriculum and subjects. Also, from the name, its not quite clear whether schools.moodle.org would be teacher centric or student centric. just my 2 cents. David Van Assche On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:46 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Very

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar on Ubuntu LiveUSB is ready

You are correct, its only for Intrepid... but its cool and easy never the less :-) and intrepid is out now, so now's a good a time as any to upgrade... David On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I never seen it on Hardy. -walter On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:07

Re: [sugar] Sugar on Ubuntu LiveUSB is ready

. thanks david On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:19 AM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like our friends at Ubuntu have been hard at work building a Subuntu live usb. Simon Peter, also know as probono, has posted

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar on Ubuntu LiveUSB is ready

will be presenting Sugar there. Kind Regards, David Van Assche On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:51 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a Edubuntu developer planning session on Nov 5th. At that point, we will see about the process of making Subuntu an official release. Ubuntu educational

Re: [sugar] [IAEP] Sugar on Ubuntu LiveUSB is ready

Thanks David that explanation make a lot more sense than my naive one. Who is the marketing/education contract guy? I would like to touch base with him. I will also be at the meeting to explain background issues if necessary. The other guys on the Ubuntu SugarTeam have gained much more

Re: [sugar] 9.1 proposal: Language learning on the XO.

nbsp;FWIW.nbsp; I have had a number of high school teacher and university instructors ask about using the xo as a language learning appliance.nbsp; The two reoccurring themes have been:XO as a portable language lab.Ability to develop a language learning activity which could tailor itself to the

[sugar] Benefits of creating activities

their personal goals through Sugar Labs. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Postponement of XOCamp Event to January

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:06 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The OLPC XOCamp event being planned for November 17 – 21 is being

Re: [sugar] Data Storage and User-facing System Requirements [was Re: 9.1 Proposal: Files]

with the file. they key is that it needs to be transparent to the software so that existing software doesn't need to change. David Lang ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] October 29 - Tarballs due for 0.83.1

trust with the community.' It would seem to me that communicating clearly with outside developers would be the first step in building trust. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] USB Based Community Access - What could work technically?

*Clinic next door to a School* - A health clinic located right next door Sasha's school has a close partnership with the school. Many students are scene there so they decided to add a donated computer to their waiting room just for kids to use Sugar. This computer still has its hard-drive, but its

Re: [sugar] USB Based Community Access - What could work technically?

classes. Sugar Labs can mimic this approach by creating an USB stick which converts existing students computers, at no perment risk, to Sugar. Sugar partners can provide server hosting either on or off site. thanks david On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote

Re: [sugar] USB Based Community Access - What could work technically?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Caroline Meeks [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: *Clinic next door to a School* - A health clinic located right next door Sasha's school has a close partnership with the school. Many students

[sugar] Sugar on Ubuntu LiveUSB is ready

and to Probono for building the sugar.squashfs. David ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] 9.1 Proposal: Files

. the fact that they will quickly disappear off the screen, and may be auto-deleted by the system greatly limits their value. David Lang Note: the pre-populated Journal entries would be no different then any other entry. If the user doesn't want them anymore, they can delete them without any

Re: [sugar] Greetings from New Hampsire

the server (useful for heavy apps like firefox+flash, video editting, blender, etc. From what I can see, LTSP already does almost all of what you are wanting it to do, unless you use some other thin client technology. Kind Regards, David Van Assche www.nubae.com On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 3:30 AM

Re: [sugar] Greetings from New Hampsire

management software, while at the same time keeping a consistent API and keeping our code separate from the sugar tree. Thanks for you willingness to work with us! By Monday, Marco our lead developer will be able to answer you questions in more detail. thanks david We are very excited about

Re: [sugar] 9.1 Proposal: Printing support

. It's the social issues around it -- handling of quotas, priorities, etc that I think deserve most attention. Paper, ink and printer time are extremely valuable. printer selection needs to happen on the client, but all the other things that you list are server-side issues, aren't they? David Lang

[sugar] Sugar, collaboration and LTSP on Ubuntu

the sugar experience with no installation necessary on the cliens. The steps mentioned can be easily replicated on other distros using the distro specific package manager. Here is a howto I wrote: http://www.nubae.com/sugar-on-ltsp-ubuntu-intrepid-ibex Kind Regards, David Van Assche www.nubae.com

Re: [sugar] [K12OSN] Sugar, collaboration and LTSP on Ubuntu

Great Work David! How long do you think it will take to push modified ejabber .debs through the Ubuntu packaging process? thanks David On 10/17/2008, 11:10, David Van Assche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:Hi there, with the generous help from #sugar devs I managed to get ltsp, sugar

Re: [sugar] code contributions to Sugar (was Re: Sugar Clock)

, and political expediency; In that order. I am not sure how to implement this. Maybe they should be stated project values? thanks david On 10/15/2008, 03:30, Tomeu Vizoso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: P.S. I think this is a good example of why

Re: [sugar] Give a Laptop, Change the World : G1G1 2008

This is also a Sugar Labs branding issue. Sugar Learning Platform does a better job of conveying we are not a stand alone solution. We are a common point of collaboration on which educators and developers build solutions for their own unique classrooms and situations. thanks david On Wed, Oct

[sugar] Sugar on Mandriva

Does anyone on the list have contacts at Mandriva. I'll start the process of pushing Sugar through Mandriva. I have very little experience with the Mandriva community. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org

[sugar] pydocweb regression fixed

The regression in pydocweb is fixed. I will go through the list of docstrings requiring review. Morgs, thanks for all the work on the network strings! thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Now YOU can write API documentation

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 13:55 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: thanks david I've started on sugar.network as I went through that code recently. Here's an issue with pydocweb: http://sugarlabs1.xen.prgmr.com/pydocweb/doc/sugar.network.GlibTCPServer/ doesn't show the name of a method starting

Re: [sugar] apis at 4%

? I can file a bug about the location of package level docstrings. alert.py bug filed thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] apis at 4%

. On the other hand, the edits we are making via pydocweb are all to docstrings. We can't mess up the code. thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] apis at 4%

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:11 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:42 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you suggest? If I understand your explanations correctly, the system already support some kind of review workflow... could devs just get involved

[sugar] how scipy uses pydocweb

be interested in what the Matplotlib project is doing with Sphinx: http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_6/ thanks david ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

[sugar] apis at 4%

correctly. If you find bugs or anything that looks kludge in the system, please let us know. This is the first time pydocweb has been used 'in the wild.' thanks david 1. http://sugarlabs1.xen.prgmr.com/pydocweb/stats/ ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar

Re: [sugar] apis at 4%

On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 23:35 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:00 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patches are flowing into the git tree correctly. If you find bugs or anything that looks kludge in the system, please let us know. This is the first

Re: [sugar] Supporting desktop applications, extending the EWMH spec

the popup blocker and disables the menubar). Note that this is a problem with the existing Firefox activity as well. you can't cover every case, but even if the menubar is disabled, the keystroke combination to close the window works. David Lang

Re: [sugar] G1G1v2 Activities

it would be a _good_thing_ if there was an entry for every activity that's supported, even if all that the 'activity' consists of is a web page that shows what the activity is and has a link to download it (useful for activities that are otherwise too large or not appropriate for all ages) David

Re: [sugar] Sugar API documentation

On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 16:24 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We certainly could do something equivalent to the Austin sprint. All being in the room together made a big difference for that initial push. Yes, I'm not sure

[sugar] [Fwd: Debian-Edu Skolelinux Developer Gathering in Oslo, Norway, October 10.-12.]

An interesting event for any of our Europe based friends. SkoleLinux is(can be) a valuable partner to Sugar Labs! Forwarded Message From: Lars Risan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debian-Edu Skolelinux Developer Gathering in Oslo, Norway, October 10.-12.

[sugar] Fragmenting or providing a foothold?

It appears that the consensus is to keep activity developers and sugar developers united on the same ML. Instead of talking specifically about the activities list, I would like to talk more generally about community growth. This discussion is premised on the belief that the future of the Sugar

Re: [sugar] Sugar on the BeagleBoard using the OpenEmbedded toolkit.

On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:14 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote: On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Op 22 aug 2008, om 02:29 heeft David Farning het volgende geschreven: Welcome to the Sugar on the BeagleBoard project. It seems that we have all of the pieces

Re: [sugar] finding sugarlabs.org resources

On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:15 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: Mikus, when the appropriate lists are decided on and created, you will find them at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/ I could find lists.sugarlabs.org now that I knew what I was looking for (and did not use the sugarlabs.org search

Re: [sugar] Developing activities.

On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:25 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote: 1. Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. We have discussed this a few time over the last few months. Now that we are getting distro (other the OLPC) related comments the time seems right 2. Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.

Re: [sugar] OT: Anybody worked with robot and OLPC

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 19:01 -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote: Hi maybe this can be of interest, http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Peripherals/Robots this is planned with open hardware. http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Open_Hardware. On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Carlos mauro

[sugar] Developing activities.

For those who have not yet gotten a chance to look at the results of Morgs activity developers survey. It is available at http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Morgs/Activities_survey/Recommendations . There is a lot of good stuff in there;) Steps Sugar Labs Should take to improve the situation: Now

[sugar] Sugar API documentation

After some discussions with Janet Swisher last week I thought it was time to take another stab at API documentation for sugar. Background: Several months ago I started experimenting with several tools to generate API documentation from the source code. After several misguided efforts, I settled

Re: [sugar] Reference Platform for Sugar ?

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 19:41 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With Sugar releases being separate from OLPC releases, is there an 'Official Platform' on which to validate that everything works? I'm not sure to fully

Re: [sugar] LiveCD LiveUSB

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:21 -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote: On Aug 31, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Jani Monoses wrote: I do not know where ISOs could be hosted though. SugarLabs can host them. I am a bit reluctant to host them at Sugar Labs. We are pushing to brand Sugar as distribution agnostic. So,

Re: [sugar] LiveCD LiveUSB

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 17:28 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Ivan Krstić wrote: On Sep 1, 2008, at 5:23 PM, David Farning wrote: I am a bit reluctant to host them at Sugar Labs. We are pushing to brand Sugar as distribution agnostic. So, distributing a Ubuntu based

Re: [sugar] Release Cycle - Responsibilities

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 01:46 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 5. Separate OLPC deployment support developers from the Sugar Labs development develops. In the last cycle it appeared that developers and managers split

[sugar] LiveCD LiveUSB

Thanks for your support on the LiveCD and LiveUSB. We now have a script that builds liveCDs and LiveUSBs. The script pulls the latest packages from the SugarTeam PPA and addeds it to the 8.4 liveCD. Where do you think we should host the build scripts and the isos? thanks dfarning

Re: [sugar] Sugar people traveling to FUDCon Brno

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, some of the Sugar developers will come out from their honeycombs and fly to Brno, Czech Republic to meet at the FUDCon Brno 2008 the September 5 - 7, 2008. The plan is to explain to whoever listens to us in which

[sugar] Sugar on the BeagleBoard using the OpenEmbedded toolkit.

Welcome to the Sugar on the BeagleBoard project. It seems that we have all of the pieces in place to do a port. First, some background. The initial port will be getting Sugar[1] to run on the Beagleboard[2] using the Open Embedded[3] toolkit. For a collaboration point, Jason has set up the

Re: [sugar] [beagleboard] Why Embedded Sugar?

On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 21:29 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: David Farning wrote: It has been a bit of a plug but it looks like we have reach critical mass for a self sustaining embedded Sugar community. I love the idea of getting a critical mass around something, but I don't yet get

[sugar] Embedded Sugar

It has been a bit of a plug but it looks like we have reach critical mass for a self sustaining embedded Sugar community. The first board will be the beagleboard[1]. We have assembled a core group of developers who are in doing the port. We will be using the Open Embedded[2] toolkit. OE is an

Re: [sugar] Sugar on Beagle Board training at ESC Boston

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 16:00 -0500, Jason Kridner wrote: Call for presentation from Sugar developers, I think it would be great if the Sugar community would put forth a training at the Embedded Systems Conference in Boston in October[1]. What sort of class do you have in mind? I will see

[sugar] Release cycle - Goals

Over the last weeks I have been looking at how we can improve our release cycle. Today will be about defining and implementing goals. Setting goals for any software project is hard, much less an open source project. Marco started the discussion last week at

Re: [sugar] 0.84 goals

On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 23:08 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, I started working on the goals for 0.84 in the wiki: http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84#Goals Here is what I have so far. * Next generation journal * File sharing * Collaboration scalability *

[sugar] Release Cycle - Responsibilities

The third step in establishing a release cycle will be determining responsibilities. This will be the biggest challenge. Assessment of areas to improve. This is not meant as a slight on the hard work any individuals at OLPC have done on Sugar. I am amazed at the overall progress you have made

[sugar] Release Cycle

Now that Sugar Labs has released .8.2 to OLPC it is time to revisit the release cycle issue. I have the feeling that most of us agree _in_principle_ to the idea that an established release cycle is important. As part of his Ph.D. Martin Michlmayr has done some interesting research on the topic.

[sugar] Release Cycle - Period

The first step in establishing a release cycle will be setting the period. Here again, I think that we all agree in principle on a sixth month cycle. From Sugar Labs perspective the actual time period is quite arbitrary. The lower bound is how quickly we can effectively iterate through the

Re: [sugar] Physics games on XO, Info wanted

years... There are some free samples on the website, but I'm sure that if someone contacts them and talks about the olpc project, they'd be happy to share more of them for free... website: http://ccgi.colpus.plus.com/vplabd/?q=node/16 Kind Regards, David Van Assche, OLE Nepal On Fri, Aug 8, 2008

Re: [sugar] Congratulations! but Sugar sucks

done on any of them. David Lang___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Design Question

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:53 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: Hi All, Can I get a quick +1/-1 on this question related to http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7331 The new Home View in 8.2.0 will have three available styles. We need to pick one to default on first upgrade or install. Choices are:

Re: [sugar] Abiword 2.6.4 on Ubuntu (was Re: Write needs your help)

the source that should work too I can build it without problems on my hardy system... just requires a lot of development library dependencies like below, you need to install libglib2.0-dev Kind Regards, David Van Assche On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [sugar] proposed addition to the Activities page templete

On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 03:17 -0400, Walter Bender wrote: We'd need to do some serious QA to figure this out, but I think it would go a long ways towards giving people a sense of what they can expect in terms of a robust use of Sugar. -walter As a related update on

[sugar] [Fwd: Re: Sugar on Debian]

I am forwarding this question from Jonas Smedgaard the Debian package maintainer to the developer list. dfarning Forwarded Message From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sugar on Debian Date

Re: [sugar] [Sugar] Browse extension/plugin structure

, as Browse already (via XULrunner) allows for plugins. Or do you see it differently? Kind Regards, David Van Assche On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please speak to me of your thoughts on the security implications of making Browse extensible. Thanks

[sugar] [Sugar] Browse extension/plugin structure

Regards, David Van Assche ___ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

Re: [sugar] Sugar and OLPC release processes

On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:03 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, I discussed a bit with Michael how to integrate Sugar and OLPC release processes. I'm going to summarize the outcoming here. * SugarLabs should try to schedule his release a few months before the OLPC release target

Re: [sugar] Localization team

On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 12:18 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Any reason we don't have a localization team in the wiki? Any volunteer to set it up? Translations should really be handled upstream, so it's an area where SugarLabs have to be very active. Currently, Sayamindu Dasgupta is

Re: [sugar] SugarLabs and OLPC

On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 12:15 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, there has been a bit of confusion on how the OLPC and SugarLabs schedules relates, in particular regarding translation and string freeze. http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/localization/2008-July/001139.html I'm

  1   2   >