I wasnt aware squeak was a firmware binary or a font... No but seriously, that passage talks about just fonts.. not software that uses wrongly licensed components, which is what squeak is
David On 11/6/08, Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 20:18, David Van Assche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem here is that edubuntu and its packages are in Ubuntu Main, > > and for sugar to be in there, there must be no non-free software in > > it, and squeak is not totally free. Apple fonts not being modifiable, > > iirc. Its pretty much the same policy as debian. > > This does not seem to be the case, according to > http://www.ubuntu.com/community/ubuntustory/components > : > > > "The licences for software applications in main must be free, but main may > also may contain binary firmware and selected fonts that cannot be modified > without permission from their authors. In all cases redistribution is > unencumbered." > > -lf > > _______________________________________________ Sugar mailing list Sugar@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar