Jim Gettys wrote:
These discussions should be best be on email, or at worst scheduled,
published in advance IRC meetings (*with minutes*). This project is
world wide, with participation in (almost) every timezone and continent;
we must enable all interested to participate. As projects
Ivan,
The community itself needs to decide on a set of people who are the
group of sysadmin people for Sugar's possible move to be something all
are comfortable about.
These discussions should be best be on email, or at worst scheduled,
published in advance IRC meetings (*with minutes*). This
On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
The community itself needs to decide on a set of people who are the
group of sysadmin people for Sugar's possible move to be something all
are comfortable about.
Please don't top post, and please do quote relevant sections of
original e-mails
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 21:16 +0200, Ivan Krstić wrote:
On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
The community itself needs to decide on a set of people who are the
group of sysadmin people for Sugar's possible move to be something all
are comfortable about.
Please don't top post, and
I've been working on a rough draft of a governance model that I'll
post to the wiki for comments as soon as it is beyond the
stream-of-conscience stage (leaning heavily on the Gnome model). Stay
tuned!!
-walter
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:01 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri,
5 matches
Mail list logo
