I must admit, I don't really understand this proposal; and I want to,
because it raises important issues for activity signing. Sayamindu, can you
explain the options as you see them:
-in very general terms, what is the ui (control panel is enough on this
point)
-what code is activated by this ui
Re: Scratch etoys: the problem with updating translations in
place is that it doesn't support distributed work on translations:
OLPC might do basic translations; they might be further developed in a
country or region, etc. Each might be updated individually.
Further, you want to be able to
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:47 AM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: Scratch etoys: the problem with updating translations in
place is that it doesn't support distributed work on translations:
OLPC might do basic translations; they might be further developed in a
country or region,
Hello.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
One of the things in my TODO for 9.1 is to have a better mechanism for
language packs[1] in the XO. The primary goal of language packs is to
decouple the process of translations from the process of OS
4 matches
Mail list logo
