Re: [Sugar-devel] XFT emacs rocks on the XO...

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Samuel Klein s...@laptop.org wrote: Also, the XO ships with a very limited vim. yum install vim-enhanced has improved my part-time vim usage. can we fix this in the next refresh? how much extra space did it take? vim is useful. We do have vim-minimal, which

Re: [Sugar-devel] Auto-authentication for Browse -

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Plan C - Simple HTTP cookie Here is a rough cut on the plan C, against the tip of sucrose-0.82 - works on first execution of Browse - works on subsequent executions of Browse - adds the cookie entry if needed

Re: [Sugar-devel] Auto-authentication for Browse -

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Carol Farlow Lerche c...@msbit.com wrote: There is an underlying set of security utilities that belong to Mozilla (NSS Good info! I'll be quite happy to look into the toolchain you mention at a later stage, or to take patches from a motivated volunteer. I am

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread David Van Assche
hey there sean essentially there is no difference between SoaS and cd the problem comes from the distro specific intricacies, which can be many more than devs care to admit... I agree.. this is not a usable product unless it alll works... saying oh welll speak doesnt work because of x

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar.profile.jabber_registered and sugar.profile.is_registered() are deprecated?

2009-02-11 Thread Morgan Collett
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:07, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Working with sucrose-0.82, I was surprised to discover that - there is no codepath that will set jabber_registered to true - the only reliable thing to use is profile.jabber_server - profile.is_registered() not

Re: [Sugar-devel] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Morgan Collett
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 04:14, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote: ok? I guess this will be contreversial but it must be said and acted upon (much more importantly) Im gonna try and make this easy: SoaS - the latest fedora core based I tried to impress my 9 year old gescwister...

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, I see frustration but I'm having trouble knowing who should have done something and failed to do it. Can we get a list of issues, each of them with a list of people that may be able to do something about them? Thanks, Tomeu On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:16, David Van Assche

[Sugar-devel] Ignoring certain exceptions while debugging...?

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Having said that, there's a bug. The 'except' line in the patch should be a bare 'except:'. In my last patch, I mistakenly committed an 'except IOError:' instead of a bare 'except:'. I changed the exception as a

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar.profile.jabber_registered and sugar.profile.is_registered() are deprecated?

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, way back we found that tracking is_registered was unreliable, Fair enough. However, a number of operations on the client side need to know whether Sugar thinks it is registered. Ask the server? Hmmm, no. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar.profile.jabber_registered and sugar.profile.is_registered() are deprecated?

2009-02-11 Thread Morgan Collett
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:32, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, way back we found that tracking is_registered was unreliable, Fair enough. However, a number of operations on the client side

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 10 machine to build soas-1 images

2009-02-11 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, do we have any F10 machine we can use to build Soas? sugarlabs1 has an old kernel, which prevents me to build XO images. I'll likely need sudo on it. Did you find one? I can ask prgmr.com to move our buildslaves to a new XEN VM which works with

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar.profile.jabber_registered and sugar.profile.is_registered() are deprecated?

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: I mean if we need to reinstate the is_registered tracking, or something like that... I'm not sure of the status of the registration feature in 0.84 - all I can say authoritatively is that from a jabber server

[Sugar-devel] hello and how can I Join?

2009-02-11 Thread victor
Hello everyone, I have finally been able to turn my attention back to OLPC/XO. So now I would like to see how I can join the development team in sugarlabs. Particularly my expertise is in the area of audio and there are two things I am particularly interested in: 1. Audio infrastructure, csound

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:29, S Page i...@skierpage.com wrote: Ed McNierney wrote: On the other hand, anyone working on Sugar efforts such as Activity development should be encouraged to put all those efforts under the Sugar Labs roof where they can be more readily available to the entire

Re: [Sugar-devel] hello and how can I Join?

2009-02-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
victor wrote: Hello everyone, I have finally been able to turn my attention back to OLPC/XO. So now I would like to see how I can join the development team in sugarlabs. Awesome, welcome at Sugar Labs. So the first important part you already did - subscribe to this list and stepped up :)

Re: [Sugar-devel] no way to unsubscribe

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar is now redirected to the sugar-devel list on Sugar Labs. How am I supposed to unsubscribe now? Try http://lists.laptop.org/options/sugar -- Luke Faraone

Re: [Sugar-devel] no way to unsubscribe

2009-02-11 Thread Simon Schampijer
Luke Faraone wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hi, http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar is now redirected to the sugar-devel list on Sugar Labs. How am I supposed to unsubscribe now? Try http://lists.laptop.org/options/sugar Awesome

[Sugar-devel] buildbot traffic

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
Luke, Can you make sure that traffic from the buildbot is making it through list moderation? thanks david ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:22AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote: you know what the irony is with all this... all we need to do to get those packs working is type ./configure --with-libabiword I know because I took the painful step of doing it in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Morgan Collett
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:22, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:22AM +0100, David Van Assche wrote: you know what the irony is with all this... all we need to do to get those packs working is type ./configure

[Sugar-devel] Fuse module to access datastore files from normal desktop

2009-02-11 Thread Torello Querci
Hi tomeu, regards the fuse datastore module I have this questions: 1 - The title of an activity can contains all the character. But the filesystem canno handle / charater. At the moment this character became \ Is this correct? 2 - Only activity that are stored data can be accessibile. Is this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:00:19AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: I see frustration but I'm having trouble knowing who should have done something and failed to do it. Can we get a list of issues, each of them with a list of people that may be able to

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-11 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/72 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-11 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/73 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build

[Sugar-devel] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Hello all. I was thinking that maybe Sugar Labs could host, cms like drupal or joomla for Local Labs use, Would be this an overhead for our young infrastructure ? Is it better to Local Labs to have this kind of solutions sorted out locally ? Cheers! Rafael Ortiz

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 10 machine to build soas-1 images

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
I would like to get a better handle on our build farm situation. Currently, buildbots ar running on the following machines. | buildslave1.sl.o | boar.prgmr.com | Fedora10 | | buildslave2.sl.o | boar.prgmr.com | FedoraRH | | buildslave3.sl.o | hydra.prgmr.com | | buildslave4.sl.o | pgrm??

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:57:05PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 11.02.2009, at 10:59, Morgan Collett wrote: etoys This is packaged, but I think we're still missing a bit - the actual sugar activity for etoys. I don't personally have the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On 2/11/09, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero dir...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all. I was thinking that maybe Sugar Labs could host, cms like drupal or joomla for Local Labs use, Would be this an overhead for our young infrastructure ? Is it better to Local Labs to have this kind of solutions

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread victor
Yes, originally this was an XO-fedora only thing. However the olpcsound 'lightweight' option is actually in the upstream sources (as a build option). Currently it might be the case that it is i*86 only (not sure how well it would build on other archs). So if packagers are interested in this, they

Re: [Sugar-devel] XFT emacs rocks on the XO...

2009-02-11 Thread Gary C Martin
On 11 Feb 2009, at 05:59, Martin Langhoff wrote: Stock F9 emacs isn't very usable on the XO screen, unfortunately. Lack of fonts and high dpi make it rather painful. After struggling a bit to get a comfy hacking/editing environment on my XOs, I ended up installing the precooked Xft-enabled

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
I tend to think that a cms is a bit of overkill for a young organization. One of my personal long term goal is to determine how we can clone SL in Local SLs by reproducing the best practices of SL on a more local scale. Developer side: 1. The key component is the release cycle, ever thing else

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how can IJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
Very cool - Anything you can push upstream is a win for everyone:) david On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:51 AM, victor victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie wrote: Yes, originally this was an XO-fedora only thing. However the olpcsound 'lightweight' option is actually in the upstream sources (as a build

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging sugar-etoys-activity. Drop an email to debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org . Ubuntu POV: Someone needs to volunteer hacking[1] together a sugar activity package

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Maybe the issue here is that local labs have a much broader scope than the global Sugar Labs? I see local labs having something to say about everything that the global Sugar Labs does, but not the other way around. Regards, Tomeu On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 17:35, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero

Re: [Sugar-devel] A small request.

2009-02-11 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Another issue is how we integrate the updater with addons.sl.o. Because the OLPC microformat is trivial, it might be easy to modify the remora's html output to be compatible with it. Mick, Tomeu and David, who have had a closer look at the code, might want to comment.

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how canIJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread victor
You mean olpcsound.spec in upstream CSound sources, or more (or something else) than that? No, I mean there is an scons option (something like buildOLPC=1). I have a spec of course, but that's for a fedora rpm. You mean Felipe? yes, Felipe. And of course yourself, I was not aware you were

Re: [Sugar-devel] csound or olpcsound (was Re: hello and how canIJoin?)

2009-02-11 Thread Wade Brainerd
Could the performance modifications be made into a runtime option, specified in a configuration file or command line option somehow? On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:46 AM, victor victor.lazzar...@nuim.ie wrote: You mean olpcsound.spec in upstream CSound sources, or more (or something else) than

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Maybe the issue here is that local labs have a much broader scope than the global Sugar Labs? I agree completely. Hopefully the local labs will focus in on a particular area of the sugar ecosystem. A testing lab, a

Re: [Sugar-devel] XFT emacs rocks on the XO...

2009-02-11 Thread Gary C Martin
On 11 Feb 2009, at 16:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 16:52, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote: On 11 Feb 2009, at 05:59, Martin Langhoff wrote: Stock F9 emacs isn't very usable on the XO screen, unfortunately. Lack of fonts and high dpi make it rather painful.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging sugar-etoys-activity. Drop an email to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 18:29, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Maybe the issue here is that local labs have a much broader scope than

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Samuel Klein
Can someone create a project hosting page for new projects on the sl wiki? On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:29, S Page i...@skierpage.com wrote: Then http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Project_hosting is obsolete. What's the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: No need to get into details of what exactly is flawed with my packaging style, or how you would do things differently: I'm just trying to see if I'm missing something as far as the workflow. Simply put, the commands given

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Faraone
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: I like that part. Are there criteria for removing someone's project if it's deemed inappropriate? Not yet, but I assume if someone thinks that somebody else's use of SL infrastrucutre is not under the project scope we'll

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Static services for Local Labs

2009-02-11 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Yes, I guess there is no problem with this, with the already given infrastructure give by SL is more than enough. Local Labs are independent enough to manage to have other services. Rafael Ortiz On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:48 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.orgwrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

2009-02-11 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/75 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [PyCon-Organizers] Open government sprint?

2009-02-11 Thread Edward Cherlin
Is anybody going to PyCon? We have booth space and could use coders and mentors for the sprints. -- Forwarded message -- From: Edward Cherlin echer...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [PyCon-Organizers] Open government sprint? To: Jacob Kaplan-Moss

[Sugar-devel] buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on sugar-base-Ubuntu804

2009-02-11 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a failed build of sugar-base-Ubuntu804 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/sugar-base-Ubuntu804/builds/0 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Ubuntu804 Build Reason: Build

Re: [Sugar-devel] Build intrastructure

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: [cc += sugar-de...@] Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: As Peter suggested, I should look at getting nightly builds set up soon. Would you like to share infrastructure so that the build run spits out SoaS images at the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] activites known not to either work at all or not on certin platforms

2009-02-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 03:38:04PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: No need to get into details of what exactly is flawed with my packaging style, or how you would do things

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Fwd: [PyCon-Organizers] Open government sprint?

2009-02-11 Thread Greg Dekoenigsberg
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Edward Cherlin wrote: Is anybody going to PyCon? We have booth space and could use coders and mentors for the sprints. I will be there. --g ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] FlipSticks-2

2009-02-11 Thread Aleksey Lim
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/FlipSticks/FlipSticks-2.tar.bz2 == Bundle == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/FlipSticks/FlipSticks-2.xo == NEWS = * OLPC#4740 Implement collaboration * OLPC#6892 GPL requirements * OLPC#9183 COPYING file is missed *

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] FlipSticks-2

2009-02-11 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:17:08PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: == Source == [...] == Bundle == [...] == NEWS = [...] Feature request: please add a link to a description of the activity (e.g. [1] in this case) to release announcements. Even better: add a short description (e.g. the Summary

Re: [Sugar-devel] Auto-authentication for Browse -

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Andrés Ambrois I might be missing something, but you're storing the laptop serial number instead of the pubkey inside the cookie (unless /ofw/mfg-data/SN doesnt stores a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread Samuel Klein
Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment supporting long-term maintenance of a server hosting projects (one of the two mentioned so far in this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activities migration status

2009-02-11 Thread David Farning
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote: Is there no way to move/create an activity so that the same code push will update both sl's gitorious and olpc's git? Until there is a policy of sorts in place, and better yet an endowment supporting long-term maintenance

[Sugar-devel] etextRead activity and espeak

2009-02-11 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, The educational team at OLENepal would like a 'karaoke-style' text reader above all other activities on the XO. This is primarily for English. Looking at the activity code, it looks like the speech code is there but disabled. Would it be possible to release a version that supports espeak

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] webactivity: seed the XS cookie at startup

2009-02-11 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:47 PM, martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: When starting up, call seed_xs_cookie() to Hi Simon, Hoping for some review :-) . Do you think this patch can make it into the sucrose-0.82 branch? With a tad of elbow grease, it also applies on top of master. The reason I ask